The Perceptions of English Teachers to the SIOP® Model and Its Impact on Limited English Proficiency

Ozge Inceli

Abstract


Limited English proficiency is the difficulty in comprehension and production in English.  In this study, the efficiency of the Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol (SIOP) Model was examined to indicate the components that are lesson preparation, building background, comprehensible input, strategies, interaction, practice and application, lesson delivery, review and assessment. The basic purpose of the research was to investigate how teachers improve the student’s language performance for limited English proficiency through using the SIOP® Model. In this paper, a qualitative research approach and semi-structured interview were used to discover the teacher’s perceptions about the SIOP® Model, and the research is to find out the problems in limited English proficiency. 10 participants (3 males and 7 females) aged from 26 to 34 (M = 30.9). The results indicate that the factors of SIOP® model can guide limited English proficient students and suggest some useful strategies for language teachers to handle the students’ difficulties in language comprehension.


Keywords


the SIOP® Model, limited English proficiency, interest, understandable contexts, supporting language production

Full Text:

PDF

References


August, D., Beck, I. L., Calderón, M., Francis, D.J., Lesaux, N. K., Sc Shanahan, T. (2008). Instruction and professional development. In D. August Sc T. Shanahan (Eds.). Developing reading and writing in second-language learners. New York: Routledge; Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics; Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

Bear, D.R., Invernizzi, M., Templeton, S., & Johnston, F. (2004). Words their way: Word study for phonics, vocabulary, and spelling instruction (2nd Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.

Burger, S. (1989). Content-based ESL in a sheltered psychology course: input, output, and outcomes. TESL Canada Journal, 6(2), 45-59.

Carrell, P. L. (1983). Some issues in studying the role of schemata, or background knowledge, in second language comprehension. Reading in a foreign language, 1(2), 81-92.

Creswell J.W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.

Cuevas, P., Lee, O., Hart, J., & Deaktor, R. (2005). Improving science inquiry with elementary students of diverse backgrounds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(3), 337–357.

Dole, J., Duffy, G., Roehler, L., S & Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research in reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61, 239-264

Driscoll, R. K. (2011). How Sheltered Instruction Affects the Academic Achievement of Low Income, Special Education, English Language Learners at the Secondary Level.

Echevarria, J., & Colburn, A. (2006). Designing lessons: Inquiry approach to science using the SIOP Model. In A. Lathman & D. Crowther, (Eds.), Science for English language learners (pp. 95–108). Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.

Echevarria, J., Richards-Tutor, C., Canges, R., & Francis, D. (2011). Using the SIOP Model to Promote the Acquisition of Language and Science Concepts with English Learners. Bilingual Research Journal, 34(3), 334-351. doi:10.1080/15235882.2011.623600

Echevarria, J., Richards‐Tutor, C., Chinn, V. P., & Ratleff, P. A. (2011). Did they get it? The role of fidelity in teaching English learners. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54(6), 425-434.

Echevarria, J., Short, D., & Powers, K. (2008). Making content comprehensible for non-native speakers of English: The SIOP model. International Journal of Learning, 14(11), 41-49.

Echevarría, J., Vogt, M., & Short, D. (2008). Making content comprehensible for english learners, the siop model. (Third ed.). Allyn & Bacon.

Echevarria, J., & Vogt, M. (2010). Using the SIOP Model to improve literacy for English learners. New England Reading Association Journal, 46(1), 8-15.

Fiorito, J. (2006). Limited English Proficiency. AdventistEducation, 59.

Glesne, C. (2010). Becoming qualitative researchers, an introduction. (4th ed. ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

Gökdemir, C. V. (2010). Üniversitelerimizde verilen yabancı dil öğretmindeki başarı durumumuz. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6(2), 251-264.

Goldenberg, C. (2008). Teaching English language learners: What the research does and does not say. The American Educator, 32{2), 8-23

Hauptman, P., Wesche, M., & Ready, D., 1988. Second-language acquisition through subject matter learning: a follow-up study at the University of Ottawa. Language Learning 38, 433–471.

Herczog, M. M. (2012). What's Our Objective for English Learners? Preparation for College, Career, and Citizenship via Language Objectives and Research-based Instruction. Social Studies Review, 51(1), 89-93.

Jensen, E. (2005) Teaching with the brain in mind, second edition. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Jiménez,R.T.,Garcia,G.E., & Pearson,P.D.(1996). The reading strategies of bilingual Latina/o students who are successful English readers: Opportunities and obstacles. Reading Research Quarterly, 57{6), 576-578

Klingner, J. K., Boardman, A. G., Eppolito, A. M., & Schonewise, E. A. (2012). Supporting Adolescent English Language Learners' Reading in the Content Areas. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 10(1), 35-64.

Krashen, S. D., & Terrell, T. D. (1998). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom.New York: Prentice Hall Intemational.

Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. New York, Longman.

Krashen, S. (2003). Explorations in Language Acquisition and Use: The Taipei Lectures. Heinemann Publishing Company, Portsmouth, NH.

Lafayette, R., & Buscaglia, M. (1985). Students learn language via a civilization course—a comparison of second language acquisition environments. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 7, 323–342.

Lawrence, L. (2007). Cognitive and Metacognitive Reading Strateies Revisted: Implications for Instruction. Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 7(3), 55-71.

Marshall C & Rossman BG (1989). Design Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Navarro, A. M. (2008). Building Schema for English Language Learners. Online Submission.

Otway, M. N. (2007). Teachers' Practices, Perceptions, and Perspectives of Instructing English Language Learners. ProQuest.

Scarcella, R. (2003). Academic English: A conceptual framework (Technical report 2003-1). Santa Barbara, CA: Linguistic Minority Research Institute.

Schwarzer, D. (2009). Best practices for teaching the “whole” adult ESL learner. New Directions For Adult & Continuing Education, (121), 25-33. doi:10.1002/ace.322

Short, D., & Echevarria, J. (2004). Teacher skills to support English language learners. Educational Leadership, 62(4), 8-13.

Short, D., Echevarria, J., & Richards-Tutor, C. (2011). Research on academic literacy development in sheltered instruction classrooms. Language Teaching Research, 15(3), 363–380.

Suarez-Orozco, C , Suarez-Orozco, M., &Todorova, I. (2008). Learning a new land: Immigrant students in American society. Boston: The Belknep Press of Harvard University Press.

Varela, E. (2010). Mainstreaming ELLs into Grade-Level Classes. Education Digest, 76(2), 39-43.

Villegas, A.M., & Lucas, T. (2007). The culturally responsive teacher. Educational Leadership,64{6), 28-33.

Vogt, M.E., & Echevarria, J. (2008). 99 ideas and activities for teaching English learners with the SIOPModel. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Zhang, Y. (2011). Supporting Adult Learners' Use of Reading Strategies through Effective Literacy Scaffolding.International Forum Of Teaching & Studies, 7(2), 20-31.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/13

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies  E-ISSN: 2149-1291

Copyright © Center for Ethnic and Cultural Studies (CECS) Publishing Inc.

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the 'ejecs.org' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.

SCImago Journal & Country Rank  EBSCO HostCrossRef DOI – EScience Press

upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1d/Gal... News & Views: Analyzing the DOAJ - Delta ThinkICI Journals Master Listerihplus hashtag on TwitterProQuest (@ProQuest) | Twitter