Devoid Elites and the Need for a New Elite Configuration: An Analysis of Post-Soviet Societies on the Example of Azerbaijan

Abstract views: 244 / PDF downloads: 92




Azerbaijan, clientelism, devoid elites, hyperagents, imposed unity elites, loyalty, post-Soviet, power, elite theory


This paper provides a comprehensive study of the Azerbaijani ruling elites. This study aims to describe the post-Soviet Azerbaijani elites, their interaction, and their influence to elaborate a basis for studying the impact on the government and the economy. The study focuses on the definition and origin of the Azerbaijani elites after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the analysis of their interactions, and the definition of behavior and hierarchy. The study relies on Higley and Burton’s (2006) elite configurations framework and Wedel’s (2003) concept of clans. It draws on qualitative analysis and applies analytical autoethnographic approaches to analyze and interpret the information received. The study used data from 113 informal dialogue interviews with those who worked closely with the elite and the elite representatives. These data provided detailed descriptions of their life and behavior in Central Asia and the South Caucasus. The total number of respondents was 1,817 people. Not all elites have equal access to power. Some, called “hyperagents,” control most decisions. Others, whom the author defines as “devoid elites”, have very little or no real power, although they have some privileges that the elites are endowed with in society. The researcher proposes a new elite configuration entitled “imposed unity elites”, which better describes the majority of Azerbaijani elites. This elite configuration implies the existence and behavior of devoid elites. It also describes elites that seem to be united in public but lacks any basic ideology or common goals. The research contributes to the further development of Higley and Burton’s (2006) framework of elite configurations and the theory of the influence of elites. The possible application of the obtained research results will allow scientists to better understand the development characteristics of the elite configuration in the post-Soviet space and their impact on the state.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Michael Gerlich, SBS Swiss Business School

Michael Gerlich is PhD, currently works as a Senior Lecturer at the Management Department, SBS Swiss Business School, Zurich-Kloten, Switzerland. Research interests: Azerbaijan, post-Soviet, elite theory.


Abramova, M., & Vilisov, M. (2020). The post-soviet transition: Constitutional structuring and political reality (CIS countries case-study). Cuestiones Constitucionales, 42, 3–38. DOI:

Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Crown Publishers. DOI:

Alvaredo, F., Atkinson, A., Piketty, T., & Saez, E. (2022). World top incomes database. Cessda.

Antonyan, Y. (2023). Power, family and business: Practices of oligarchic economy in late soviet and post-soviet Armenia (before 2018). In T. Koellner (Ed.), Family firms and business families in cross-cultural perspective: Bringing anthropology back in (pp. 83–113). Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI:

Azerbaijan Statistical Information Service.(2022). The State Statistical Committee of the Republic of Azerbaijan.;JSESSIONID=FE47579408B6115A84FE8C96031DAEC3#994_002

Bagirov, S. (2021). Political and historical features of the formation of the elite in Azerbaijan. Transylvanian Review, 29(3), Article 1.

Balan, A. (2020). European integration as a historical desideratum of the elites in the Central and Eastern European states. L’europe Unie / United Europe (France), 16, 50–59.

Bernstein, P. W., & Swan, A. (2007). All the money in the world: How the Forbes 400 make—and spend—their fortunes. Knopf.

Best, H., & Higley, J. (2018). The Palgrave handbook of political elites. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI:

Bhattacharyya, S. (2020). A history of global capitalism: Feuding elites and imperial expansion. Springer Nature. DOI:

Boswell, J., Corbett, J., Dommett, K., Jennings, W., Flinders, M., Rhodes, R. A. W., & Wood, M. (2019). State of the field: What can political ethnography tell us about anti‐politics and democratic disaffection? European Journal of Political Research, 58(1), 56–71. DOI:

Broers, L., & Mahmudlu, C. (2023). Civic dominion: Nation-building in post-soviet Azerbaijan over 25 years of independence. Nationalities Papers, 51(1), 47–63. DOI:

Burton, M., & Higley, J. (2001). The study of political elite transformations. International Review of Sociology/Revue Internationale de Sociologie, 11(2), 181–199. DOI:

Casas, T., & Cozzi, G. (2022). Elite Quality Report 2022: Country scores and global rankings (28 April 2022). Seismo. DOI:

Chancer, L. S. (2019). Elite ethnography. In C. M. Abramson & N. Gong (Eds.), Beyond the case: The logics and practices of comparative ethnography (pp. 238–-262). Oxford University Press. DOI:

Cianetti, L., Dawson, J., & Hanley, S. (2020). Rethinking 'democratic backsliding' in Central and Eastern Europe. Routledge. DOI:

Collins, K. (2006). Clan politics and regime transition in Central Asia. Cambridge University Press. DOI:

Colton, T., & Tucker, R. C. (2019). Patterns in post-Soviet leadership. Routledge. DOI:

Cousin, B., Khan, S., & Mears, A. (2018). Theoretical and methodological pathways for research on elites. Socio-Economic Review, 16(2), 225–249. DOI:

Daloz, J.-P. (2010). The sociology of elite distinction: From theoretical to perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI:

Dewan, M. (2018). Understanding ethnography: An ‘exotic’ ethnographer’s perspective. In P. Mura & C. Khoo-Lattimore (Eds.), Asian qualitative research in tourism: Perspectives on Asian tourism (pp. 185–203). Springer. DOI:

DiCicco‐Bloom, B., & Crabtree, B. F. (2006). The qualitative research interview. Medical Education, 40(4), 314–321. DOI:

Dogan, M. (2003). Introduction: Diversity of elite configurations and clusters of power. In M. Dogan (Ed.), Elite configurations at the apex of power (pp. 1–15). Brill NV. DOI:

Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 36(4), 273–290.

Ergun, A. (2010). Post-Soviet political transformation in Azerbaijan: Political elite, civil society and the trials of democratisation. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 7(26), 67–85.

Ergun, A., & Sayfutdinova, L. (2021). Informal practices in the making of professionals: The case of engineers in Soviet and Post-Soviet Azerbaijan. Work, Employment and Society, 35(5), 931–947. DOI:

Friedman, S., & Reeves, A. (2020). From aristocratic to ordinary: Shifting modes of elite distinction. American Sociological Review, 85(2), 323–350. DOI:

Gallo, E. (2021). Globalisation, authoritarianism and the post-Soviet state in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. Europe-Asia Studies, 73(2), 340–363. DOI:

Gerlich, M. (2021). How elite configurations explain shifts from democracy to authoritarian or totalitarian regimes: Turkey as a case study. Open Journal of Political Science, 11, 273–300. DOI:

Gherghina, S., & Volintiru, C. (2021). Political parties and clientelism in transition countries: Evidence from Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine. Acta Politica, 56(4), 677–693. DOI:

Gilleard, C. (2020). Bourdieu's forms of capital and the stratification of later life. Journal of Aging Studies, 53, Article 100851. DOI:

Glasius, M. (2018). What authoritarianism is… and is not: a practice perspective. International Affairs, 94(3), 515–533. DOI:

Gulbrandsen, T. (2019). Theoretical perspectives on elites. In T. Gulbrandsen (Ed.), Elites in an egalitarian society (pp. 21–51). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. DOI:

Guliyev, F. (2020). Formal-informal relations in Azerbaijan. Caucasus Analytical Digest.

Harrington, B. (2017). Habitus and the labor of representation among elite professionals. Journal of Professions and Organization, 4(3), 282–301. DOI:

Hartmann, M. (2007). The sociology of elites. Routledge. DOI:

Hénin, P. Y., & Insel, A. (2021). Hungary's U-turn in Kornai's system paradigm perspective: A case for national authoritarian capitalism. Public Choice, 187(1), 235–245. DOI:

Henriksen, L. F., & Seabrooke, L. (2021). Elites in transnational policy networks. Global Networks, 21(2), 217–237. DOI:

Herzog, L., & Zacka, B. (2019). Fieldwork in political theory: Five arguments for an ethnographic sensibility. British Journal of Political Science, 49(2), 763–784. DOI:

Higley, J. (2010a). Elite theory and elites. In K. T. Leicht & J. C. Jenkins (Eds.), Handbook of politics: Handbooks of sociology and social research (pp. 161–176). Springer. DOI:

Higley, J. (2010b). Epilogue: Democratic elitism and western political thought. In H. Best & J. Higley (Eds.), Democratic Elitism (pp. 210–225). Brill. DOI:

Higley, J. (2018a). Continuities and discontinuities in elite theory. In H. Best & J. Higley (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of political elites (pp. 25–39). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI:

Higley, J. (2018b). Political elites in the west. In H. Best & J. Higley (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of political elites (pp. 315–328). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI:

Higley, J., & Burton, M. (2006). Elite foundations of liberal democracy. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

Higley, J., & Pakulski, J. (1995). Elite transformation in central and eastern Europe. Australian Journal of Political Science, 30(3), 415–435. DOI:

Hille, C. (2020). Clans. In C. Hille (Ed.), Clans and democratization: Chechnya, Albania, Afghanistan and Iraq (pp. 13–41). Brill. DOI:

Hoffmann-Lange, U. (2018). Theory-based typologies of political elites. In H. Best & J. Higley (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of political elites (pp. 53–68). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI:

Horak, S., & Bader, V. (2023). Persistence and strengths of informal networks–clientelism in the post-Soviet Union. European Journal of International Management, 19(2), 265–294. DOI:

Ibrahimova, G., & Moog, P. (2023). Colonialism versus independence: The role of entrepreneurial ecosystems in Azerbaijan over time. Small Business Economics. Advance online publication. DOI:

Jones, B. (2021). Elites in the United Kingdom. In B. Jones & P. Norton, I. Hertner (Eds.), Politics UK (10th ed., pp. 180-–193). Routledge. DOI:

Junisbai, B., & Junisbai, A. (2019). Regime type versus patronal politics: a comparison of “ardent democrats” in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. Post-Soviet Affairs, 35(2), 240–257. DOI:

Kailitz, S., & Stockemer, D. (2017). Regime legitimation, elite cohesion and the durability of autocratic regime types. International Political Science Review, 38(3), 332–348. DOI:

Kapidžić, D. (2021). The rise of illiberal politics in Southeast Europe. In D. Kapidžić & V. Stojarová (Eds.), Illiberal politics in Southeast Europe (pp. 1–17). Routledge. DOI:

Karaoğuz, H. E. (2022). The developmental state in the 21st century: A critical analysis and a suggested way forward. Panoeconomicus, 69(1), 55–72. DOI:

Karpa, M. I., Akimova, L. M., Akimov, O. O., Serohina, N., Oleshko, O., & Lipovska, N. (2021). Public administration as a systemic phenomenon in society. Ad Alta: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 11, 56–62.

Lindenfors, P., Wilson, M., & Lindberg, S. I. (2020). The Matthew effect in political science: head start and key reforms important for democratisation. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), Article 106. DOI:

Lindgren, B. M., Lundman, B., & Graneheim, U. H. (2020). Abstraction and interpretation during the qualitative content analysis process. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 108, Article 103632. DOI:

Longo, M., & Zacka, B. (2019). Political theory in an ethnographic key. American Political Science Review, 113(4), 1066–1070. DOI:

Maclean, M., Harvey, C., & Kling, G. (2014). Pathways to power: Class, hyper-agency and the French corporate elite. Organisation Studies, 35(6), 825–855. DOI:

Marques, D. F. (2021). Political phenomenology as ethnographic method. In J. Melançon (Ed.), Transforming politics with Merleau-Ponty: Thinking beyond the state (pp. 145–163). Rowman & Littlefield.

McDonald, D. (2022). Popular protests and democratization in post-Soviet countries: An analysis of why some democracy movements failed and others succeeded [Undergraduate Thesis, University of Mississippi].

Melville, A., & Mironyuk, M. (2015). “Bad enough governance”: state capacity and quality of institutions in post-Soviet autocracies. Post-Soviet Affairs, 32(2), 132–151. DOI:

Niftiyev, I. (2022). Principal component and regression analysis of the natural resource curse doctrine in the Azerbaijani economy. Journal of Life Economics, 9(4), 225–239. DOI:

Nisnevich, Y., & Ryabov, A. (2020). Post-Soviet authoritarianism. Russian Social Science Review, 61(6), 538–554. DOI:

O’Brochta, W. (2023). Elite responses to ethnic diversity and interethnic contact. Political Behavior. Advance online publication. DOI:

Pleines, H. (2019). The political role of business magnates in competitive authoritarian regimes. Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftsgeschichte/Economic History Yearbook, 60(2), 299–334. DOI:

Plows, A. (2008). Social movements and ethnographic methodologies: An analysis using case study examples. Sociology Compass, 2(5), 1523–1538. DOI:

Pogodda, S., & Richmond, O. P. (2015). Palestinian unity and everyday state formation: Subaltern ‘ungovernmentality’ versus elite interests. Third World Quarterly, 36(5), 890–907. DOI:

Raleigh, C., & Wigmore-Shepherd, D. (2022). Elite coalitions and power balance across African regimes: introducing the African cabinet and political elite data project (ACPED). Ethnopolitics, 21(1), 22–47. DOI:

Reeves, S., Kuper, A., & Hodges, B. D. (2008). Qualitative research methodologies: Ethnography. BMJ, 337, Article a1020. DOI:

Robinson, W. I. (2012). Global capitalism theory and the emergence of transnational elites. In A. Kakabadse & N. Kakabadse (Eds.), Global elites: The opaque nature of transnational policy determination (pp. 54–73). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI:

Ruostetsaari, I. (2021). Fragmentation of the inner circle of power: Circulation between the Finnish elites in 1991–2021. Scandinavian Political Studies, 45(1), 110–133. DOI:

Rutland, P. (2023). Thirty years of nation-building in the Post-Soviet states. Nationalities Papers, 51(1), 14–32. DOI:

Salverda, T., & Abbink, J. (2013). Introduction: An anthropological perspective on elite power and the cultural politics of elites. In J. Abbink & T. Salverda (Eds.), The anthropology of elites: Power, culture, and the complexities of distinction (pp. 1–28). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI:

Samadov, B. (2019). Authoritarianism and social mobilization in Azerbaijan: Subjectivities, logics, fantasies [Master’s thesis, Central European University].

Sanghera, B., & Satybaldieva, E. (2020). The other road to serfdom: The rise of the rentier class in post-Soviet economies. Social Science Information, 59(3), 505–536. DOI:

Smirnova, E., Kot, S., Kolpak, E., & Shestak, V. (2021). Governmental support and renewable energy production: A cross-country review. Energy, 230, Article 120903. DOI:

Smit, D. (2019). Power and class in political fiction: Elite theory and the post-war Washington novel. Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI:

Steen, A. (2019). Between past and future: elites, democracy and the state in post-communist countries: a comparison of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. Routledge. DOI:

Suny, R. G. (2019). Elite transformation in late-soviet and post-soviet Transcaucasia, or what happens when the ruling class can't rule? In T. Colton & R. C Tucker (Eds.), Patterns in post-Soviet leadership (pp. 141–167). Routledge. DOI:

Szanyi, M. (2022). The emergence of patronage and changing forms of rent seeking in East Central Europe. Post-Communist Economies, 34(1), 122–141. DOI:

Thurlow, C., & Jaworski, A. (2017). Introducing elite discourse: The rhetorics of status, privilege, and power. Social Semiotics, 27(3), 243–254. DOI:

Varshney, A. (2021). Populism and nationalism: An overview of similarities and differences. Studies in Comparative International Development, 56(2), 131–147. DOI:

Visser, O., Dorondel, S., Jehlička, P., & Spoor, M. (2019). Post-socialist smallholders: Silence, resistance and alternatives. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d'études du développement, 40(4), 499–510. DOI:

Wacquant, L. (2019). Bourdieu’s dyad: On the primacy of social space and symbolic power. In J. Blasius, F. Lebaron, B. Le Roux, & A. Schmitz (Eds.), Empirical investigations of social space (pp. 15–21). Cham: Springer. DOI:

Wedel, J. R. (2003). Clans, cliques and captured states: Rethinking ‘transition’ in central and eastern Europe in the former Soviet Union. Journal of International Development, 15, 437–440. DOI:

Wedel, J. R. (2017). From power elites to influence elites: Resetting elite studies for the 21st century. Theory, Culture & Society, 34(5-6), 153–178. DOI:

Wedel, J. R. (2021). Shadow elite: How the world’s new power brokers undermine democracy, government, and the free market. In A. Bågenholm, M. Bauhr, M. Grimes, & B. Rothstein (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the quality of government (63–C4.P221). Oxford University Press. DOI:

World Values Survey Association (2018). WVSW 7: 2017-2022.

Zimmerman, C. C. (2014). Family and civilisation. Open Road Media.




How to Cite

Gerlich, M. (2023). Devoid Elites and the Need for a New Elite Configuration: An Analysis of Post-Soviet Societies on the Example of Azerbaijan. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 10(4), 13–42.



Original Manuscript
Received 2023-03-10
Accepted 2023-08-18
Published 2023-09-19