The Power of Poetic Rhetoric: Evidence from The Discourse of Trump’s Presidential Campaign

Mohammed Fath Addin

doi:10.29333/ejecs/2814

Authors

Mohammed Fath Addin King Khalid University https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3478-3468

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/2814

Keywords:

Donald Trump, rhetorical strategies, poetic formulas, populism, ideological polarization

Abstract

This study investigates the rhetorical strategies employed by Donald Trump during his 2016 presidential campaign, focusing on how his discourse constructed power relations, mobilized political support, and reshaped landscape of American political communication. Employing Clark’s (2009) framework of rhetorical-poetic formulas, the analysis examines campaign speeches, social media posts, and public press released statements across three dimensions: the construction of polarized “us versus them” narrative, the strategic use of Twitter to amplify populist messaging and bypass traditional media gatekeeping, and the development of emotional appeals—particularly fear, anger, and nostalgia—to galvanize voters engagement. The findings reveal a consistent reliance on hyperbola claims, confrontational language, and emotionally charged slogans to position Trump as a defender of “real Americans.” His use of poetic formulas—organizing, mnemonic, disciplining, verbomotor, and headlining devices—enhanced narrative coherence, ideological consistency, and cultivated audience relatability. Repetitive phrases and nostalgic imagery functioned as mnemonic anchors and identity markers, sustaining binary opposition and fostering digital echo chambers. By examining Trump’s rhetoric within the broader context of populist communication, this study underscores its disruptive influence on democratic discourse and highlights the critical importance of analyzing the intersection of language, identity, and digital platforms in contemporary populist rhetoric.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Mohammed Fath Addin, King Khalid University

Mohammed Fath Addin is an Assistant Professor in Department of English at King Khalid University, Saudi Arabia. His research focuses on English Literature, the poetics of political rhetoric, and poetry. His work explores the intersections between literary form and public discourse; particularly how poetic techniques inform political expression.

References

Almahasees, Z., & Mahmoud, S. (2022). Persuasive Strategies utilized in the Political Speeches of King Abdullah II: A Critical Discourse Analysis. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2022.2082016

Andreouli, E., Figgou, L., & Kadianaki, I. (2025). Citizenship in social and political psychology: A relational and future‐oriented framework for the study of everyday citizenship practice. Political Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.70064 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.70064

Arditi, B. (2022). Populism is hegemony is politics? Ernesto Laclau’s theory of populism. In M. Oswald (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of populism (pp. 49–68). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80803-7_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80803-7_3

Aristotle (1991). On Rhetoric, translated by George Kennedy. Oxford University Press

Atmawijaya, T. D. (2024). Reclaiming the Narrative: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Donald Trump's 2024 Super Tuesday Campaign Speech. K@ ta, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.9744/kata.26.2.87-102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9744/kata.26.2.87-102

Ayton, D. (2023). Thematic analysis. Qualitative Research–a practical guide for health and social care researchers and practitioners. Monash University Press.

Bessai, J. W. (2025). Populist Style, Nationalist Affect, and the Aporetic Condition: Rhetorical Realignment in Canada’s 2025 Election. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2025.2565772 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2025.2565772

Byers, P. P. (1979). A formula for poetic intonation. Poetics, 8(4), 367-380.https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(79)90007-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(79)90007-X

Clark, T. (2009). Towards a Poetics of Contemporary Public Language: The Poetic Formula in Focus. Journal of the Australasian Universities Language and Literature Association, 2009(111), 103–129. https://doi.org/10.1179/000127909805259607 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/000127909805259607

Clark, T., Walsh, M., & de Costa, R. (2012). Resonating opinions and identities: Using poetics methods to explore non-Aboriginal attitudes towards Aboriginal reconciliation in Australia. Asiatic: IIUM Journal of English Language and Literature, 6(2), 110-127.https://doi.org/10.31436/asiatic.v6i2.263

Cropp, S. (2023). Analyzing problematic information in the political discourse in Pakistan. Global Social Sciences Review, 8(1), 45–60. https://www.humapub.com/admin/alljournals/gssr/papers/vHFviPeMA1.pdf

Dar, N. K., Khan, M.S., Naz, R., & Ali, A. (2024). Assessing semantic perception, morphological awareness, reading comprehension and delay time processing in autistic children. Journal of Arts and Linguistics Studies, 2(3), 1737-1760. https://jals.miard.org/index.php/ jals/article/view/182

Enli, G. (2017). Twitter as arena for the authentic outsider: Exploring the social media campaigns of Trump and Clinton in the 2016 US presidential election. European Journal of Communication, 32(1), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323116682802 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323116682802

Entman, R. M., & Rojecki, A. (1993). Freezing out the public: Elite and media framing of the U.S. anti‐nuclear movement. Political Communication, 10(2), 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1993.9962973 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1993.9962973

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and text: Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. Discourse & society, 3(2), 193-217.https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926592003002004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926592003002004

Fanani, A., Setiawan, S., Purwati, O., Maisarah, M., & Qoyyimah, U. (2020). Donald Trump’s grammar of persuasion in his speech. Heliyon, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03082 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03082

Finlayson, A. (2023). Overlapping methodologies? Rhetoric, English Studies, and the social world. English: Journal of the English Association, 72(278), 96-101. https://doi.org/10.1093/english/efad031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/english/efad031

Gee, J. P. (2020). How to do discourse analysis: A toolkit (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003537991 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003537991

Hamed, D. M., & Alqurashi, N. (2025). Impact vs. vision: a critical discourse analysis of Trump and Harris’ leadership rhetoric in the 2024 presidential election. Frontiers in Communication, 10, 1541513. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1541513 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1541513

Hassan, I. H., & ElMansy, S. Y. (2023). Unleashing Argumentation in Netflix’s Docudramas: Illocutionary Pluralism and Multimodal Rhetoric in the Trailer for Queen Cleopatra (2023). Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 10(5), 84–111. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/1773 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/1773

Hawkins, K. A. (2009). Is Chávez Populist? Measuring Populist Discourse in Comparative Perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 42(8), 1040–1067. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009331721 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009331721

Herrick, M. T. (1948). The place of rhetoric in poetic theory. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 34(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335634809381353 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335634809381353

Horne, C. M. (2017). Populism and President Trump’s Approach to Foreign Policy: An Analysis of Rhetoric and Strategy. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395720935380

Houghton, D. P. (2021). Political rhetoric and affective responses: Understanding emotional engagement in political communication. American Political Science Review, 115(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305542000076X

Hyslop, J. (2021). The Kaiser's lost African empire and the Alternative für Deutschland: Colonial guilt-denial and authoritarian populism in Germany. Historia, 66(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.17159/2309-8392/2021/v66n2a5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/2309-8392/2021/v66n2a5

Ilyas, Y., Noureen, H., & Ali, A. (2023). Syntactic layer of coordination and conjuncts agreement: Evidence from Pakistani English newspapers. Journal of Education and Social Studies, 4(3), 683–691. https://doi.org/10.52223/jess.2023.4328 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52223/jess.2023.4328

Jiménez-Preciado, A. L., Álvarez-García, J., Cruz-Aké, S., & Venegas-Martínez, F. (2025). The Power of Words from the 2024 United States Presidential Debates: A Natural Language Processing Approach. Information, 16(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16010002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/info16010002

Kadim, E. N. (2022). A critical discourse analysis of Trump's election campaign speeches. Heliyon, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09256 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09256

Khajavi, Y., & Rasti, A. (2020). A discourse analytic investigation into politicians’ use of rhetorical and persuasive strategies: The case of US election speeches. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2020.1740051

KhosraviNik, M. (2017). Social media critical discourse studies (SM-CDS). In The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies (pp. 582-596). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315739342-40

Kriesi, H. (2014). The Populist Challenge. West European Politics, 37(2), 361–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2014.887879 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2014.887879

Lacatus, C. (2021). Populism and President Trump’s approach to foreign policy: An analysis of tweets and rally speeches. Politics, 41(1), 31-47. https: //doi.org/10.1177/0263395720935380 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395720935380

Lacatus, C., & Meibauer, G. (2023). Crisis, Rhetoric and Right-Wing Populist Incumbency: An Analysis of Donald Trump’s Tweets and Press Briefings. Government and Opposition, 58(2), 249–267. doi:10.1017/gov.2021.34 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2021.34

Lehman, I. M., Sułkowski, Ł., & Nowakowska, I. (2025). Constructing charisma in text: A corpus-based rhetorical analysis of leadership communication in higher education inaugural speeches. Communication Monographs, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2025.2545247 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2025.2545247

Mahmoud, R. H. (2023). Identity construction and speech acts in Ernaux’s The Years: A corpus-based feminist stylistic analysis. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 10(5), 172–188. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/1763 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/1763

Mangad, J. V., Gaston, R. H., & Ulla, M. B. (2024). Examining the rhetorical landscape of political campaign slogans in the Philippines: a rhetorical-semantic analysis. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2417510

Mansouri, M. E., & Parina, J. C. (2023). The Battle Cry of Resistance Against Inequality and Injustice: A Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 10(3), 128–143. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/1580 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/1580

McNair, B. (2017). An introduction to political communication (6th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315750293 (Note: McFarland may be a misreference; McNair is the author of this key text. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315750293

Moayerian, N., Poets, D., Stephenson, M., & g, C. (2023). The Arts and Individual and Collective Agency: A Brazilian Favela Case Study. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 10(4), 58–80. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/1407 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/1407

Moffitt, B. (2018). Populism/anti-populism ivide in Western Europe. Democratic Theory, 5(2), 1-16. https: //doi.org/10.3167/dt.2018.050202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3167/dt.2018.050202

Mustafa, S. (2023). A fairclough-based Analysis of Persuasive Strategies in Trump and Biden’s Speeches. BELT - Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal, 14(1), e44170. https://doi.org/10.15448/2178-3640.2023.1.44170 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15448/2178-3640.2023.1.44170

Papageorgiou, A. (2019). Gatekeeping the plenary floor: Discourse network analysis as a novel method for studying parliamentary debates. Politics and Governance, 7(1), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i1.1776

Parkin, S., & Kimergård, A. (2021). A critical analysis of respondent quotes used as titles of qualitative research papers that are published in peer-reviewed journals. Accountability in Research, 29(2), 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2021.1901224 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2021.1901224

Perry, E. J. (2018). Introduction: Chinese political culture revisited. In Popular Protest and Political Culture in Modern China (pp. 1-14). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494826-1

Pery, C. (2018). Uniting Trump’s America: Rhetorical constructions in Donald Trump’s political discourse. Kansas State University.

Prafitri, W., & Nasir, M. A. A. (2023). Persuasive strategies in Donald Trump's political speeches. EBONY: journal of English language teaching, linguistics, and literature, 3(1), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.37304/ebony.v3i1.7780 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37304/ebony.v3i1.7780

Rambukkana, N. (2023). Platform Intimacies. Canadian Journal of Communication, 48(1), 175-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/cjc.2022-0065

Rubsamen, C. (2020). 'I Am a Popularist': A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Populist Rhetoric of Donald Trump's Presidential Campaign (Doctoral dissertation, University of Hawai'i at Manoa).

Schauffler, N., Ketschik, N., Blessing, A., Jung, K., Bernhart, T., Kinder, A., ... & Vu, T. (2023). Exploring intonational patterns of poetic speech: Insights from a large corpus of German poetry. In Proc. TAI 2023 (pp. 83-87). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21437/TAI.2023-18

Smith, S. L. (2018). Declarations on HIV & AIDS: An analysis of religious and secularist discourses [Doctoral dissertation, University of Glasgow]. Enlighten: Theses. https://theses.gla.ac.uk/30615/13/2018smithdpt.pdf

Stastny, A., Henriss-Anderssen, S., Clark, T. (2016). The Poetics of Non-Indigenous Reflexive Self-awareness: Strategies of Embodiment and Delegation in Focus Group Discussions in Australia. In: Maddison, S., Clark, T., de Costa, R. (eds) The Limits of Settler Colonial Reconciliation. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2654-6_10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2654-6_10

Telfer, T. G. (2017). Rediscovering the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Power: Political and Constitutional Challenges to the Canadian Bankruptcy Act, 1919-1929. Sask. L. Rev., 80, 37.

Turner-Zwinkels, F. M., et al. (2023). Affective polarization and political belief systems: The role of political identity and the content and structure of political beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672231183935 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672231183935

Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & society, 4(2), 249-283.https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006

Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Opinions and ideologies in the press. Approaches to media discourse, 21(63), 1-33.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2024). Discourse and ideologies of the radical right. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/elements/discourse-and-ideologies-of-the-radical-right/0CE754DF4007DFBBB51C3AC5C2155DFC

van Stekelenburg, J., & Klandermans, B. (2022). Social psychology of movement participation. In D. Snow, D. della Porta, D. McAdam, & B. Klandermans (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell encyclopedia of social and political movements. Wiley. https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/social-psychology-of-movement-participation-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470674871.wbespm161.pub2

Waisbord, S. (2018). Populism as media and communication phenomenon. In C. Rovira Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P. Ochoa Espejo, & P. Ostiguy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of global populism (pp. 25–38). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315226446-18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315226446-18

Waisbord, S. (2018). The elective affinity between post-truth communication and populist politics. Communication Research and Practice, 4(1),17-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2018.1428928 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2018.1428928