The Arts and Individual and Collective Agency: A Brazilian Favela Case Study


Abstract views: 348 / PDF downloads: 148

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/1407

Keywords:

Brazil, civil society organization, democratic agency, neoliberalism, social imaginary

Abstract

Brazil’s favela residents have long challenged the dominant media and social narrative that has, for decades, described them via discourses of criminality. This article examines the work of Redes da Maré, a civil society organization that offers cultural spaces and services for community-based creation and diffusion of the arts in its namesake favela. We employ the concepts of the social imaginary as well as individual and collective agency to investigate whether and in what ways a service-providing civil society organization that has adopted a cultural development approach encourages participants’ democratic attitudes and behaviors at the organizational and community level to challenge existing systemic social oppression by fostering participation in the development process and offering a platform for the expression of the voices of those it engages. Our analysis is based in part on interviews with 4 lead organizers and participants in Redes’ Free Dance School of Maré. Our analysis contributes to a more nuanced understanding of the roles the arts can play in encouraging democratic agency and possibility among favela citizens despite adverse political and social conditions exacerbated by neoliberal beliefs and policies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Neda Moayerian, University of Tehran

Neda Moayerian is an Assistant Professor at the University of Tehran School of Urban Planning and a Non-Resident Research Associate at the Virginia Tech Institute for Policy and Governance. Neda’s research interests include hospitality discourse in tourism and refugee studies, arts-based community development, nongovernmental organizations and international development.

Desirée Poets, Virginia Tech

Desiree Poets is assistant professor of postcolonial theory at the Department of Political Science and a core faculty of the Alliance for Social, Political, Ethical, and Cultural Thought (ASPECT) PhD Program. Her research focuses on settler colonial, postcolonial, and dependency theories in Latin America; urban (de)militarization; arts, collective memory and community change, and questions of gender, ethnicity, class, and race. Her work has been published, among others, in Citizenship Studies, the Bulletin of Latin American Research, Critical Military Studies, and Settler Colonial Studies. Her manuscript, Unsettling Brazil, is under contract with the University of Alabama Press.

Max Stephenson Jr., Professor of Public and International Affairs and Director Virginia Tech Institute for Policy and Governance Virginia Tech

Max Stephenson Jr., serves as a Professor of Public and International Affairs and the Director of the Institute for Policy and Governance at Virginia Tech. His current research interests include political agency and social change dynamics, democratization and development and human rights and refugee policy.

Cathy Grimes, Virginia Tech

Cathy Grimes is the communications director for the Virginia Tech Graduate School. Prior to joining the university, she spent 20 years as an award-winning reporter, editor, social media manager and project coordinator at several news companies, including the Seattle Times Company and the Daily Press Media Group. She was a Nieman Fellow at Harvard University. Her research interests include message framing, speech codes, and the roles of journalism and the media in and across communities. She holds a bachelor’s degree from the University of Washington, and a master’s degree from Virginia Tech.

References

Adams, D., & Goldbard, A. (2005). Creative community: The art of cultural development. Lulu Press.

Bacon, J. (2012). The art of community: Building the new age of participation. O’Reilly Media, Inc.

Barnes, N., Poets, D., & Max O. Stephenson, J. (2021). Maré from the Inside. In Virginia Tech Publishing. Virginia Tech Publishing. https://doi.org/10.21061/mare DOI: https://doi.org/10.21061/mare

Basso, J. C., Satyal, M. K., & Rugh, R. (2020). Dance on the brain: Enhancing intra- and inter-brain synchrony. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14, Article 584312. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.584312 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.584312

Batley, R., & Rose, P. (2011). Analysing collaboration between non-governmental service providers and governments. Public Administration and Development, 31(4), 230–239. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.613 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.613

Benhabib, S. (1999). Sexual difference and collective identities: The new global constellation. Signs, 24(2), 335–361. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3175645 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/495343

Benhabib, S. (2007). Another universalism: On the unity and diversity of human rights. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 81(2), 7–32. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27653991

Benhabib, S. (2008). Another cosmopolitanism. Oxford University Press.

Bennett, J. (2013). Moralising class: A discourse analysis of the mainstream political response to Occupy and the August 2011 British riots. Discourse and Society, 24(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926512463634 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926512463634

Bledsoe, A. (2019). Racial sntagonism and the 2018 Brazilian presidential election. Journal of Latin American Geography, 18(2), 165–170. https://doi.org/10.1353/lag.2019.0021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lag.2019.0021

Boal, A. (1993). Theatre of the oppressed (C. A. McBride, Trans.; Tcg ed. edition). Theatre Communications Group.

Booth, K. (1995). Culture builds communities. The Partners.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Brinkerhoff, D. W., & Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2011). Public–private partnerships: Perspectives on purposes, publicness, and good governance. Public Administration and Development, 31(1), 2–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.584 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.584

Carothers, T. (2016). Closing space for international democracy and human rights support. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 8(3), 358–377. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huw012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huw012

Christensen, D., & Weinstein, J. M. (2013). Defunding dissent: Restrictions on aid to NGOs. Journal of Democracy, 24(2), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2013.0026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2013.0026

Coe, D. (2017). “Dance has connected me to my voice”: The value of reflection in establishing effective dance pedagogy. Waikato Journal of Education, 9(2003), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.15663/wje.v9i0.384 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15663/wje.v9i0.384

Cohen-Cruz, J., & Schutzman, M. (Eds.). (2006). A Boal companion: Dialogues on theatre and cultural politics. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203300794

Coutinho, M. H., & Soter, S. (2019). Teatro e dança no Centro de Artes da Maré: Ações de contra-mundo [Theater and dance at the Centro de Artes da Maré: Counter-world actions]. Urdimento: Revista de Estudos Em Artes Cênicas, 1(34), 60–76. https://doi.org/10.5965/1414573101342019060 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5965/1414573101342019060

Davis, M. (2013). Planet of slums. New Perspectives Quarterly, 30(4), 11–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/npqu.11395 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/npqu.11395

Debroux, T. (2017). The visible part: Of art galleries, artistic activity and urban dynamics. Articulo–Journal of Urban Research, 15. https://doi.org/10.4000/articulo.3409 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/articulo.3409

Dupuy, K., & Prakash, A. (2020). Global backlash against foreign funding to domestic nongovernmental organizations. In W. W. Powell & P. Bromley (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (3rd ed., pp. 618–630). Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503611085-038 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503611085-038

Dupuy, K., Ron, J., & Prakash, A. (2016). Hands off my regime! Governments’ restrictions on foreign aid to non-governmental organizations in poor and middle-income countries. World Development, 84, 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.02.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.02.001

Fleming, R. L. (2007). The art of placemaking: Interpreting community through public art and urban design. Merrell London.

Foweraker, J. (2001). Grassroots movements and political activism in Latin America: A critical comparison of Chile and Brazil. Journal of Latin American Studies, 33(4), 839–865. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X01006241 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X01006241

Fraser, N. (2000). Rethinking recognition. New Left Review, 3, 107–120.

Fraser, N. (2007). Special section: Transnational public sphere: Transnationalizing the public sphere: On the legitimacy and efficacy of public opinion in a post-Westphalian world. Theory, Culture and Society, 24(4), 7–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407080090 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407080090

Fraser, N. (2009). Scales of justice: Reimagining political space in a globalizing world. Columbia University Press.

Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001

Gaztambide-Fernández, R., VanderDussen, E., & Cairns, K. (2014). “The Mall” and “the Plant”: Choice and the Classed Construction of Possible Futures in Two Specialized Arts Programs. Education and Urban Society, 46(1), 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124512438226 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124512438226

Gell, A. (1998). Art and agency: An anthropological theory. Oxford University Press.

Goldbard, A. (2006). New creative community: The art of cultural development. New Village Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt21pxmht

Goldbard, A. (2013). The culture of possibility: Art, artists and the future. Waterlight Press.

International Center for Not-for-profit Law. (2018). Building Alliances, Strengthening Freedoms [Annual Report]. ICNL. https://www.icnl.org/wp-content/uploads/ICNL-Annual-Report-2018-19-web-final.pdf

James, P. (2019). The social imaginary in theory and practice. In C. Hudson & E. K. Wilson (Eds.), Revisiting the global imaginary (pp. 33–47). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14911-6_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14911-6_3

Jornal Nacional. (2018). Jair Bolsonaro (PSL) é entrevistado no Jornal Nacional [Jair Bolsonaro is interviewed at Jornal Nacional] [Video]. Globoplay. https://globoplay.globo.com/v/6980200/

Kay, A. (2000). Art and community development: The role the arts have in regenerating communities. Community Development Journal, 35(4), 414–424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/35.4.414

Kirakosyan, L., & Stephenson, M. (2019). Arts as dialogic practice: Deriving lessons for change from community-based art-making for international development. Psych, 1(1), 375–390. https://doi.org/10.3390/psych1010027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/psych1010027

Kraehe, A. M., & Lewis, T. E. (2018). Introduction: Flashpoints—the breakthrough of sociocultural difference. In S. Travis, A. M. Kraehe, E. J. Hood, & T. E. Lewis (Eds.), Pedagogies in the flesh: Case studies on the embodiment of sociocultural differences in education (pp. 1–14). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59599-3_1

Lacerda, D. S. (2015). Rio de Janeiro and the divided state: Analysing the political discourse on favelas. Discourse and Society, 26(1), 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926514541346 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926514541346

Lepecki, A. (2015). The choreopolitical: Agency in the age of control. In R. Martin (Ed.), The Routledge companion to art and politics (pp. 44-52). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315736693-6

Lewis, D., Kanji, N., & Themudo, N. S. (2020). Non-governmental organizations and development (2nd ed.) Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429434518 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429434518

Lucas, S. D. (2018). The primacy of narrative agency: Re-reading Seyla Benhabib on narrativity. Feminist Theory, 19(2), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700117723591 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700117723591

Marneros, D. C. (2021). Against the populist ressentiment. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Populism, 2(1), 100–112.

McCall, V. (2005). Dancing bodies, social theory, and the critique of the social sciences. In T. Buckland (Ed.), Dance in the field: Theory, methods and issues in dance ethnography (pp. 34–55). Macmillan International Higher Education.

Meban, M. (2009). The aesthetic as a process of dialogical interaction: A case of collective art praxis. Art Education, 62(6), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2009.11519043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2009.11519043

Moldavanova, A., Onishi, T., & Toepler, S. (2023). Civil society and democratization: The role of service-providing organizations amid closing civic spaces. Public Administration and Development, 43(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.2005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.2005

Molina, G., & Guinard, P. (2017). Arts in cities—Cities in arts. Articulo-Journal of Urban Research, 15. https://doi.org/10.4000/articulo.3097 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/articulo.3435

Neuwirth, R. (2016). Shadow cities. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203936245 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203936245

Perlman, J. (2010). Favela: Four decades of living on the edge in Rio de Janeiro. Oxford University Press.

Póvoa, D., Reijnders, S., & Martens, E. (2019). The telenovela effect: Challenges of location filming and telenovela tourism in the Brazilian favelas. The Journal of Popular Culture, 52(6), 1536–1556. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpcu.12861 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpcu.12861

Redes da Maré. (2021). Redes da Maré. https://www.redesdamare.org.br/en/

Rosas-Moreno, T. C., & Straubhaar, J. D. (2015). When the marginalized enter the national spotlight: The framing of Brazilian favelas and favelados. Global Media and Communication, 11(1), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742766515574114 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1742766515574114

Salamon, L. M., & Toepler, S. (2015). Government–nonprofit cooperation: Anomaly or necessity? VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(6), 2155–2177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-015-9651-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-015-9651-6

Salzman, M. B. (2018). A psychology of culture. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69420-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69420-7

Samovar, L. A., Porter, R. E., McDaniel, E. R., & Roy, C. S. (2014). Intercultural communication: A reader. Cengage Learning.

Sharp, J., Pollock, V., & Paddison, R. (2005). Just art for a just city: Public art and social inclusion in urban regeneration. Urban Studies, 42(5–6), 1001–1023. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500106963 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500106963

Soter, S., & Pavlova, A. (2017). Escola livre de dança da Maré in Rio de Janeiro: A ground to share. In J. Butterworth & L. Wildschut (Eds.), Contemporary choreography: A critical reader (2nd ed., pp. 266–276). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315563596-23

Stephenson, M. O., & Tate, A. S. (Eds.). (2015) Arts and community change: Exploring cultural development policies, practices and dilemmas. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315775814

Taylor, C. (2007). A secular age (1st ed.. Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674044289

Toepler, S., Zimmer, A., Fröhlich, C., & Obuch, K. (2020). The changing space for NGOs: Civil society in authoritarian and hybrid regimes. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 31(4), 649–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00240-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00240-7

Travers, M. (2001). Qualitative research through case studies. SAGE Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209724

Travis, S., Kraehe, A. M., Hood, E. J., & Lewis, T. E. (Eds.). (2018). Pedagogies in the flesh: Case studies on the embodiment of sociocultural differences in education. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59599-3

United Nations Office of Human Rights. (2010). Special rapporteur in the field of cultural rights. https://www.ohchr.org/en/special-procedures/sr-cultural-rights/international-standards

Valladares, L. do P. (2019). The invention of the favela (R. N. Anderson, Trans.). The University of North Carolina Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5149/northcarolina/9781469649986.001.0001

Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.. SAGE Publications.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-19

How to Cite

Moayerian, N., Poets, D., Stephenson, M., & g, C. (2023). The Arts and Individual and Collective Agency: A Brazilian Favela Case Study. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 10(4), 58–80. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/1407

Issue

Section

Original Manuscript
Received 2022-09-26
Accepted 2023-08-12
Published 2023-09-19