Unleashing Argumentation in Netflix’s Docudramas: Illocutionary Pluralism and Multimodal Rhetoric in the Trailer for Queen Cleopatra (2023)


Abstract views: 199 / PDF downloads: 164

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/1773

Keywords:

Docudrama, multimodal argumentation, Netflix, Queen Cleopatra, semiotic resources, speech acts, trailers

Abstract

Trailers for movies are generally considered aesthetic independent multimodal fragmented discourse. Since one of the key features of trailers for docudramas is to promote arguments in order to propagate the importance and worthiness of documentaries to be watched, trailers rely heavily on limited fragmented compositions and implicitness to arouse the viewer’s curiosity. This study aims to provide an enthymematic interpretation of the trailer for Netflix’s brand-new docudrama Queen Cleopatra, which has resulted in immense controversy in Egypt since its release in April 2023. Thus, the study investigates how the enthymematic property of the selected trailer is constructed through the illocutionary pluralism in the characters’ argumentative polylogues and presented through the interplay of verbal-visual semiotic resources such as montage techniques, music, moving images, colors, etc. This study adopts Wildfeuer and Pollaroli’s (2017) theoretical framework of multimodal argumentation in movie trailers supported by Lewiński’s (2021) illocutionary pluralism in argumentative polylogues. The framework foregrounds the importance of the surrounding context (Pragma-Dialectics) in multimodal rhetoric and dwells upon two levels: logic of film discourse interpretation and argumentative reconstruction of the movie trailer. Findings have revealed that the interplay of cross-modal devices and speech acts stimulates spectators to form hypotheses and draw inferences on the cinematic discourse they are subsequently invited to watch and thus to retrieve arguments in support of the claim that the advertised documentary is worth watching. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Inas Hussein Hassan, College of Language and Communication, Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport

Inas Hussein Hassan is an Associate Professor of Applied Linguistics and, currently, the Vice Dean for Postgraduate Studies and Scientific Research at the College of Language & Communication (CLC) - Alexandria, Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport, Egypt. Her research interests are in Discourse Analysis, Multimodality, Pragmatics and Education studies.

Sara Yahya ElMansy, College of Language and Communication, Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport

Sara Yahya ElMansy is a lecturer of Applied Linguistics and, currently, the Head of Humanities Department at the College of Language & Communication (CLC) - Alexandria, Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport, Egypt. She is interested in a wide array of interdisciplinary research in Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis, Multimodality, Cognitive Linguistics and Translation studies.

References

Aakhus, M., & Lewiński, M. (2017). Advancing polylogical analysis of large-scale argumentation: Disagreement management in the fracking controversy. Argumentation, 31(1), 179–207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-016-9403-9

Asher, N., & Lascarides, A. (2001). Indirect speech acts. Synthese, 128, 183–228. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010340508140 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010340508140

Bateman, J. A. (2007). Towards a grande paradigmatique of film: Christian Metz reloaded. Semiotica, 2007(167), 13–64. https://doi.org/10.1515/SEM.2007.070 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/SEM.2007.070

Bateman, J., & Wildfeuer, J. (2014). A multimodal discourse theory of visual narrative. Pragmatics,74, 180–2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.10.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.10.001

Bermejo-Luque, L. (2011). Giving reasons: A linguistic-pragmatic approach to argumentation theory. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1761-9

Braet, A. (1999). The enthymeme in Aristotle’s rhetoric: from argumentation theory to logic. Informal Logic, 19(2), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v19i2.2322 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v19i2.2322

Burt, G. (2007). The art of film music. Northeastern University Press.

Clark, B. (2022). Pragmatics: The basics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003197263 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003197263

Clark, H. H., & Carlson, T. B. (1982). Hearers and speech acts. Language, 58(2), 332–373. https://doi.org/10.2307/414102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1982.0042

Dornaletetxe Ruiz, J. (2007). Definicion y naturaleza del trailer cinematografico [Add Translated Title]. Pensar la Publicidad, 1, 99–117.

Dornaletetxe Ruiz, J. (2009). El trailer cinematografico: Historia de un genero publicitario em EE.UU [The cinematographic trailer: History of an advertising genre in the US]. Pensar la Publicidad, 3, 163–180.

Dornaletetxe Ruiz, J. (2012). The semiotic status of movie trailers. Proceedings of the 10th World Congress of the International Association for Semiotic Studies (IASS/AIS) Universidade da Coruña (España / Spain), 1875–1884.

Dusi, N. (2002). Le forme del trailer come manipolazione intrasemiotica [The forms of the trailer as intersemiotic manipulation]. In I. Pezzini (Ed.), Trailer, spot, clip, siti, banner. Le forme brevi della comunicazione audiovisiva (pp. 31–66). Meltemi.

Hill, A. (2016). Scoring the screen: The secret language of film music. Oxford University Press.

Iordache, I., Raats, T., & Mombaerts, S. (2022). The Netflix original documentary, explained: Global investment patterns in documentary films and series. Studies in Documentary Film, 17(2), 151–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/17503280.2022.2109099 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17503280.2022.2109099

Kernan, L. (2004). Coming attractions: American movie trailers. University of Texas Press.

Kraus, M. (2003). Charles S. Peirce’s Theory of abduction and the Aristotelian enthymeme from signs. In F. H. van Eemeren, J. A. Blair, C. A. Willard, & A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Anyone who has a view 237–254. Amsterdam: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-1078-8_19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1078-8_19

Lanigan, R. L. (1995). From enthymeme to abduction: The classical law of logic and the postmodern rule of rhetoric. In L. Langsdorf, & A. R. Smith (Eds.), Recovering pragmatism’s voice. The classical tradition, Rorty, and the philosophy of communication, 49–70. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Lewiński, M. (2014). Argumentative polylogues: Beyond dialectical understanding of fallacies. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 36(1), 193–218. https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2014-0010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2014-0010

Lewiński, M. (2021). Speech act pluralism in argumentative polylogues. Informal Logic, 41(3), 421–451. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v41i3.6855 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v41i3.6855

Maier, C. (2009). Visual evaluation in film trailers. Visual Communication 8(2), 159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1470357209102112 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357209102112

Metz, C. (1989). Semiologia del cinema: saggi sulla significazione nel cinema [Semiology of cinema: essays on meaning in cinema]. Garzanti.

Mittelberg, I., & Hinnell, J. (2021). Gesture studies and semiotics. In J. Pelkey & P. Cobley (Eds.), Semiotic movements (pp. 183-214). Bloomsbury Academic.

Nur Fitria, T. (2021). Representation of symbols in “Parasite” Movie. ISLLAC: Journal of Intensive Studies on Language, Literature, Art, and Culture, 5, 239–250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17977/um006v5i22021p239-250

Page, R. (Ed.). (2009). New perspectives on narrative and multimodality (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203869437 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203869437

Pollaroli, C. (2014). The argumentative relevance of rhetorical strategies in movie trailers. In B. Garssen, D. Godden, G. Mitchell, & A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th international conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, 1–4 July 2014 (pp. 1178–1192). SicSat.

Smith, V. (2007). Aristotle’s classical enthymeme and the visual argumentation of twenty-first century. Argumentation and Advocacy, 43(3-4), 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2007.11821667 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2007.11821667

Terrone, E. (2020). Documentaries, docudramas, and perceptual beliefs. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 78(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/jaac.12703 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jaac.12703

Tseng, C. (2013). Analysing characters’ interactions in filmic text: A functional semiotic approach. Social Semiotics, 23(5), 587–605. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2012.752158 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2012.752158

Wildfeuer, J. (2012). Intersemiosis in film: Towards a new organization of semiotic resources in multimodal filmic text. Multimodal Communication, 1(3), 276–304. https://doi.org/10.1515/mc-2012-0016 Wildfeuer, J. (2014a). Film discourse interpretation. Towards a new paradigm for multimodal Film analysis. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mc-2012-0016

Wildfeuer, J. (2014b). Coherence in film: Analysing the logical form of multimodal discourse. In Maiorani & C. Christie (Eds.), Multimodal epistemologies: Towards an integrated framework (pp. 260–274). Routledge.

Wildfeuer, J., & Pollaroli, C. (2017). Seeing the untold: Multimodal argumentation in movie trailers. In A. Tseronis & C. Forceville (Eds.), Multimodal argumentation and rhetoric in media genres, Vol. 14 (pp. 190–216). John Benjamins Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.14.08w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.14.08wil

Downloads

Published

2023-12-19

How to Cite

Hassan, I. H. ., & ElMansy, S. . Y. (2023). Unleashing Argumentation in Netflix’s Docudramas: Illocutionary Pluralism and Multimodal Rhetoric in the Trailer for Queen Cleopatra (2023). Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 10(5), 84–111. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/1773
Received 2023-07-15
Accepted 2023-08-30
Published 2023-12-19