Socioeconomic Determinants of Caste-based Endogamy: A Qualitative Study


Abstract views: 2143 / PDF downloads: 915

Authors

  • Muhammad Rizwan Safdar University of the Punjab
  • Muhammad Akram Eastern Mennonite University
  • Falak Sher GC University Faisalabad
  • Abid Rahman University of Pewhawar, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/697

Keywords:

caste, economic dynamics, Endogamy, social factors, marriage system, patriarchy, social factors.

Abstract

The present study is aimed at exploring the socioeconomic determinants and implications of caste-based endogamous marriages in Punjab, the most populous province in Pakistan. The data for this study were collected from a sample of 24 participants (14 males and 10 females), who were married-within-caste, with diverse socioeconomic, educational, and geographic backgrounds. This study found social pressure, protection of family honor, geographic propinquity, and caste-based stereotyping as key social factors reinforcing endogamous marriages in the province. Finally, the desire to avoid distribution of family’s economic resources like property and land was found to be a leading economic determinant of caste-based endogamy. Further, endogamy hinders economic mobility of lower castes since economic capitals such as land and property are preserved through this marital practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Muhammad Rizwan Safdar, University of the Punjab

Muhammad Rizwan Safdar is an Assistant Professor of Sociology at the Institute of Social and Cultural Studies, University of the Punjab, Pakistan. His research interests are culture, politics, and media Sociology.

Muhammad Akram, Eastern Mennonite University

Muhammad Akram is a graduate of Conflict Transformation from the Center for Justice and Peacebuilding at Eastern Mennonite University, Virginia, USA. He writes on community justice and preventing violent extremism.

Falak Sher, GC University Faisalabad

Falak Sher earned Ph.D. Sociology and is Director of the Institute of Arts and Sciences at Government College University Faisalabad, Pakistan. He specializes in community psychology.

References

Abraham, J. (2014). Contingent caste endogamy and patriarchy. Economic and Political Weekly, 49(2), 56-65.

Akpan, L. (2018). The Political undertone in the development of nomadic education in Africa: Lessons from Nigeria. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 2(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/5791 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/5791

Ali, Q. U. A., Chaudhry, A. G., Ahmed, A., & Farooq, H. (2014). Psychological ailments and schizophrenia: An anthropological description of endogamous marriage patterns and family institution. European Academic Research, 2(7), 8775-8786.

Ambedkar, B. R. (1916). Castes in India: Their mechanism, genesis, and development. The Columbia University.

Awoyemi, J. A. (2014). Pre-marital counselling in a multicultural society. Lulu.com.

Bailey, G., & Peoples, J. (2013). Essentials of cultural anthropology. Cengage Learning.

Bhale, A. G. (2013). Perspective of educated youths towards the inter-caste marriage. IJAAR, 1(1), 18-28.

Bhusal, R. (2013). Inter-caste marriage: Social support and family care in contemporary rural Nepal. Retrieved January 18, 2018, from http://www.kuasu.cpier.kyoto-u.ac.jp/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Rajesh-Bhusal1512.pdf

Bittles, A. H. (2002). Endogamy, consanguinity, and community genetics. Journal of Genetics, 81(3), 91-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02715905

Bittles, A. H. (2005). Endogamy, consanguinity, and community disease profiles. Public Health Genomics, 8(1), 17-20. https://doi.org/10.1159/000083332 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000083332

Bunescu, I. (2015). Roma in Europe: The politics of collective identity formation. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315606811

Buss, D. M. B., & Schmitt D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: A contextual evolutionary analysis of human mating. Psychological Review, 100(2), 204-232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204

Clark, G., Cummins, N., Hao, Y., & Vidal, D. D. (2014). The Son also rises: Surnames and the history of social mobility. Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400851096

Colantonio, S. E., Fuster, V., & Marcellino, A. J. (2006). Class endogamy, inbreeding and migration during the Argentinean colonial period: Analysis based on individuals of European ancestry. Anthropologischer Anzeiger, 311-319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1127/anthranz/64/2006/311

De Neve, G. (2016). The economies of love: Love marriage, kin support, and aspiration in a South Indian garment city. Modern Asian Studies, 50(4), 1220-1249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X14000742

Drisko, J. W., & Maschi, T. (2015). Content analysis. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190215491.001.0001

Gil-White, F. J. (2005). Is ethnocentrism adaptive? An ethnographic analysis. University of Pennsylvania.

Grover, S. (2017). Marriage, love, caste, and kinship support: Lived experiences of the urban poor in India. Taylor & Francis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203732823

Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity, and “ethically important moments” in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261-280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403262360

Gupta, V. (2011). Genomic efficiency of endogamy in India. International Journal of Human Genetics, 11(3), 199-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/09723757.2011.11886143 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09723757.2011.11886143

Harper, D. (2011). Choosing a qualitative research method. In D. J. Harper & A. R. Harper (Eds.), Qualitative Research Methods in Mental Health and Psychotherapy (pp. 83-98). Wiley Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119973249.ch7

Husain, A. (1994). Human Mating Behavior. Northern Book Centre.

Hussain, R. (1999). Community perceptions of reasons for preference for consanguineous marriages in Pakistan. Journal of Biosocial Science, 31(4), 449-461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932099004496

Imtiaz, S., Ilyas, Z., Chaudhry, A. G., & Hadi, S. A. (2015). Social change, modernity, and endogamous marriages: Anthropological analysis. Pakistan Association of Anthropology, Islamabad, 27, 695-697.

Jataayu, (2014). Caste is hardly an impediment for ‘homecoming Hindus’. Retrieved June 20, 2018, from https://swarajyamag.com/culture/caste-is-hardly-an-impediment-for-homecoming-hindus

Jodhka, S., & Shah, G. (2010). Comparative contexts of discrimination: Caste and untouchability in South Asia. Economic and Political Weekly, 45(48), 99-106.

Kalmijn, M. (1998). Intermarriage and endogamy: Causes, patterns, trends. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 395–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.395

Kerckhoff, A. C., & Davis, K. E. (1962). Value consensus and need complementarity in mate selection. American Sociological Review, 27(3), 295-303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2089791

Knox, D., & Schacht, C. (2012). Choices in relationships: An introduction to marriage and the family. Nelson Education.

Mare, R. D. (1991). Five decades of educational assortative mating. American Sociological Review, 56(1), 15-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2095670

Murstein, B. I. (1980). Mate selection in 1970s. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 42(4), 777-792. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/351824

Narzary, P. K., & Ladusingh, L. (2019). Discovering the Saga of inter-caste marriage in India. Journal of Asian & African Studies, 54(4), 588-599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909619829896

Pakistan Bureau of Statistics. (2017). Population census 2017. Retrieved December 20, 2018, from https://web.archive.org/web/20171015113737/http://www.pbscensus.gov.pk/

Parmar, D., & Sengupta, L. K. (1994). Marital distance and village endogamy in Bhilala and Barela tribes of West Nimar in Central India. Journal of Human Ecology, 5(2), 127-130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09709274.1994.11907083

Pauls, P. E., & Young, G. (2016). Endogamy. Encyclopaedia Britannica Inc. Retrieved April 20, 2017, from https://www.britannica.com/topic/endogamy

Regan, P. C. (2003). The Mating Game: A Primer on Love, Sex, and Marriage. Sage Publications.

Rosenfeld, M. J. (2005). A critique of Exchange Theory in mate selection. American Journal of Sociology, 110(5), 1284-1325. https://doi.org/10.1086/428441 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/428441

Rosenfeld, M. J. (2008). Racial, educational, and religious endogamy in the United States: A comparative historical perspective. Social Forces, 87(1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.0.0077 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.0.0077

Saleem, H., Chaudhry, A. G., & Riaz, M. (2015). Endogamy and marital alliances: Anthropology of indigenous marriage patterns. Pakistan Association of Anthropology, Islamabad, 27(2), 1603-1605.

Schaefer, R. T. (2001). Sociology. McGraw- Hill.

Schwimmer, B. (2003). Lineage endogamy. Department of Anthropology at University of Manitoba. Retrieved November 6, 2017, from https://www.umanitoba.ca/faculties/arts/anthropology/tutor/marriage/lineage_endogamy.html

Sen, A. (2000). Social exclusion: Concept, application, and scrutiny. Office of Environment and Social Development, Asian Development Bank.

Shami, S. A., Qaisar, R., & Bittles, A. H. (1991). Consanguinity and adult morbidity in Pakistan. The Lancet, 338(8772), 954-955. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(91)91828-I

Snell, K. D. (2002). English rural societies and geographical marital endogamy, 1700–1837. The Economic history review, 55(2), 262-298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0289.00221

Sofroniou, A. (2015). Therapeutic Psychology. Lulu.com.

Srinivasan, K., & James, K. S. (2015). The golden cage: Stability of the institution of marriage in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 50(13), 38-45.

Stevens, G., & Swicegood, G. (1987). The linguistic context of ethnic endogamy. American Sociological Review, 52(1), 73-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2095393

Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871-1971 (pp. 136-179). Aldine. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315129266-7

Usman, A., & Amjad, A. (2013). Caste based endogamy in a Punjabi village of Pakistan. South Asian Studies, 28(2), 341.

Verma, S., & Sukhramani, N. (2018). Interfaith marriages and negotiated spaces. Society & Culture in South Asia, 4(1), 16-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2393861717730620

Waerzeggers, C. (2002). Endogamy in Mesopotamia in the first millennium BC, In mining the archives festschrift for Christopher Walker on the occasion of his 60th birthday. ISLET, 1, 319-342. http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-158894

Yee, G. A. (2003). Poor banished children of eve: Woman as evil in the Hebrew bible. Fortress Press.

Zaman, M. (2011). Exchange marriages in South Punjab, Pakistan: A sociological analysis of kinship structure, agency, and symbolic culture. Peter Lang.

Zikmund, W. G., Babin, B. J., & Griffin, M. (2013). Business research methods (9th ed.). South Western.

Downloads

Published

2021-02-10

How to Cite

Safdar, M. R., Akram, M., Sher, F., & Rahman, A. (2021). Socioeconomic Determinants of Caste-based Endogamy: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 8(2), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/697

Issue

Section

Original Manuscript
Received 2021-01-02
Accepted 2021-01-21
Published 2021-02-10

Most read articles by the same author(s)