Effect of Relationship Closeness on Group-Induced Choice Shifts Among Chinese Students


Abstract views: 451 / PDF downloads: 316

Authors

  • Junsu Park Department of Psychology Barnard College Columbia University New York
  • Do-Yeong Kim School of Business, Ajou University
  • Cheng Cheng China Energy Engineering Group (Guangzhou) Ltd, China
  • Dongju Lee Olin Business School, Washington University, St. Louis, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/331

Keywords:

group decision-making, relationship closeness, risky shift, Guanxi.

Abstract

Using hypothetical choice-dilemma scenarios, we examined the effect of relationship closeness on group-induced choice shifts in a sample of Chinese college students. Previous studies, which have shown an aversion to risk among Chinese students, have overlooked prior relationship closeness. This study attempts to fill the gap in the research by taking this factor into account. The study found that students shifted their choice toward greater risks when placed in groups composed entirely of individuals with high levels of closeness in their relationships than when they were alone. The implications of the findings are discussed from a Chinese Guanxi cultural perspective. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Jossy-Bass.

Chen, N. Y. F., & Tjosvold, D. (2007). Guanxi and leader member relationships between American managers and Chinese employees: Open-minded dialogue as mediator. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24(2), 171-189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-006-9029-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-006-9029-9

Chen, X. P., & Peng, S. (2008). Guanxi dynamics: Shifts in the closeness of ties between Chinese coworkers. Management and Organization Review, 4(1), 63-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2007.00078.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2007.00078.x

Chen, Y., Friedman, R., Yu, E., Fang, W., & Lu, X. (2009). Supervisor–subordinate Guanxi: Developing a three‐dimensional model and scale. Management and Organization Review, 5(3), 375-399. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740 8784.2009.00153.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2009.00153.x

Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (2002). Self and social identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 161-186. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135228 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135228

Fan, Y. H., Woodbine, G., & Scully, G. (2012). Guanxi and its influence on the judgments of Chinese auditors. Asia Pacific Business Review, 18(1), 83-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2010.550124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2010.550124

Griffin, E. M. (2006). A first look at communication theory. McGraw-Hill.

Han, Y., Peng, Z., & Zhu, Y. (2012). Supervisor–subordinate guanxi and trust in supervisor: A qualitative inquiry in the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(3), 313-324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1092-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1092-6

House, R. J., Wright, N. S., & Aditya, R. N. (1997). Cross-cultural research on organizational leadership: A critical analysis and a proposed theory. In P. C. Earley, & M. Erez (Eds.), New perspectives on international industrial/organizational psychology (pp. 535–625). The New Lexington Press.

Hsee, C. K., & Weber, E. U. (1999). Cross-national differences in risk preference and lay predictions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12(2), 165-179. https://ssrn.com/abstract=930081 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199906)12:2<165::AID-BDM316>3.0.CO;2-N

Hwang, K. K. (1999). Filial piety and loyalty: Two types of social identification in Confucianism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(1), 163-183. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839X.00031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839X.00031

Hwang, K. K. (2012). The deep structure of confucianism. In K.-K. Hwang (Ed.), Foundations of Chinese psychology: Confucian social relations, 99–131. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1439-1_5

Isenberg, D. J. (1986). Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(6), 1141-1151. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.6.1141 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.6.1141

James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 85-98. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85

Kim, D-Y., & Park, J. (2010). Cultural differences in risk: The group facilitation effect. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(5), 380-390.

King, A. Y. C. (1991). Kuan-hsi and network building: A sociological interpretation. Daedalus, 120(2), 63-84.

Kogan, N., & Wallach, M. A. (1964). Risk-taking: A study in cognition and personality. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Law, K. S., Wong, C. S., Wang, D. X., & Wang, L. H. (2000). Effect of supervisor – subordinate guanxi on supervisory decisions in China: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(4), 751-765. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190050075105 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190050075105

Li, S., Bi, Y. L., & Zhang, Y. (2009). Asian risk seeking and overconfidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(11), 2706-2736. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00545.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00545.x

Moscovici, S., & Zavalloni, M. (1969). The group as a polarizer of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12(2), 125-135. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027568 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027568

Naldi, L., Nordqvist, M., Sjöberg, K., & Wiklund, J. (2007). Entrepreneurial orientation, risk taking, and performance in family firms. Family Business Review, 20(1), 33-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00082.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00082.x

Park, J., Kim, D-Y., & Zhang, C. (2016). Understanding cross-national differences in risk through a localized cultural perspective. Cross-Cultural Research, 50(1), 34-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397115609560 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397115609560

Park, J., Kim, D-Y., Lee, O., & Lee, D. J. (2016, August 4–7). A national comparison of Guanxi effect on group decision making under risk: China vs. South Korea [Paper presentation]. Annual Convention of American Psychological Association, Denver, CO.

Ronay, R., & Kim, D-Y. (2006). Gender differences in explicit and implicit risk attitudes: A socially facilitated phenomenon. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45(2), 397-419. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466605X66420 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/014466605X66420

Shin, S. K., Ishman, M., & Sanders, G. L. (2007). An empirical investigation of socio-cultural factors of information sharing in China. Information & Management, 44(2), 165-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.11.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.11.004

Sitkin, S. B., & Pablo, A. L. (1992). Reconceptualizing the determinants of risk behavior. Academy of Management Review, 17(1), 9-38. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1992.4279564 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1992.4279564

Tajfel, H. (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245

Taormina, R. J., & Gao, J. H. (2010). A research model for Guanxi behavior: Antecedents, measures, and outcomes of Chinese social networking. Social Science Research, 39(6), 1195-1212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.07.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.07.003

Thibaut, J., & Kelly, H. (1959). Social Exchange Theory. In E. Griffin, (Ed.), A first look at a communication theory. McGraw-Hill.

Tjosvold, D., & Yu, Z. (2007). Group risk-taking: The constructive role of controversy in China. Group & Organization Management, 32(6), 653-674. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601106287110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601106287110

Wallach, M. A., Kogan, N., & Bem, D. J. (1962). Group influence on individual risk-taking. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65(2), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0044376 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0044376

Wei, L. Q., Liu, J., Chen, Y. Y., & Wu, L. Z. (2010). Political skill, supervisor–subordinate guanxi and career prospects in Chinese firms. Journal of Management Studies, 47(3), 437-454. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00871.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00871.x

Whitener, E. M., Brodt, S. E., Korsgaard, M. A., & Werner, J. M. (1998). Managers as initiators of trust: An exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 513-530. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926624 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926624

Wu, C. H., & Lin, Y. C. (2005). Development of a Zhong-Yong thinking style scale. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 24, 247-300.

Yang, K. S. (1992). Chinese social orientation: From the social interaction perspective. In K. S. Yang & A. B. Yu (Eds.), Chinese Psychology and Behavior, 87-142. Laurel.

Yao, X., Yang, Q., Dong, N., & Wang, L. (2010). Moderating effect of Zhong Yong on the relationship between creativity and innovation behaviour. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 13(1), 53-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2010.01300.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2010.01300.x

Downloads

Published

2020-05-18

How to Cite

Park, J., Kim, D.-Y., Cheng, C., & Lee, D. (2020). Effect of Relationship Closeness on Group-Induced Choice Shifts Among Chinese Students. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 7(1), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/331

Issue

Section

Original Manuscript