The Opinions of Gifted Students about Leadership Training

Abstract views: 1214 / PDF downloads: 509


  • Uzeyir Ogurlu Harvard Univeristy, Cambridge, Massachusetts
  • Mehmet Naci Sevim Marmara University



gifted students, leadership, leadership training, focus group interview


The aim of this research was to identify gifted middle school students’ opinions and suggestions about leadership and leadership education. For this purpose, 65 gifted middle school students who have been attending the Science and Art Center were interviewed by using the focus group. The gifted students were asked open-ended questions about leadership and leadership training. Qualitative content analysis was employed. The results of the focus group interviews showed that majority of gifted students did not want to be a leader in the future because of some reasons including lack of self-confidence and avoiding taking responsibility. But the majority believed that leadership could be improved through training and wanted to participate in leadership training in schools. The participants suggested some various ways for leadership improvement of students in the schools such as teamwork or giving responsibilities.


Download data is not yet available.


Akar, C. (2016). Investigating the students’ perceptions of the democratic values of academicians. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 7(1), 96-139. doi:10.17499/jsser.49601 DOI:

Amorose, A.J. & Horn, T.S. (2000). Intrinsic motivation; Relationship with collegiate athlete’s gender, scholarship status and perceptions of their coaches’ behavior. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 22(1), 63-84. DOI:

Arminio, J.L., S. Carter, S. E. Jones, K. Kruger, N. Lucas, J. Washington, N.Young, & Scott, A. (2000). Leadership experiences of students of color. NASPA Journal, 37(3), 496-510. DOI:

Avolio, B. J., & Vogelgesang, G. (2011). Beginnings matter in genuine leadership development. In S. E. Murphy, & R. J. Reichard (Eds.), Early development and leadership: Building the next generation of leaders (pp. 179–204) . New York: Psychology Press/Routledge.

Aydin, H , Ozfidan, B , Carothers, D . (2017). Meeting the Challenges of Curriculum and Instruction in School Settings in the United States. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 8 (3), 76-92. Retrieved from

Aydin, H. (2013). Students and teachers’ perceptions on technology enhanced Turkish language learning environment in Turkey. Educational Research and Reviews, 8(13), 986-996.

Aydın, B. (2005). Çocuk ve ergen psikolojisi. [Child and adolescent psychology] Ankara: Atlas Yayınları.

Baisheva, M , Golikov, A , Prokopieva, M , Popova, L , Zakharova, A , Kovtun, T . (2017). The potential of folk tabletop games in the development of the intelligence and creativity of children. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 8 (3), 128-138. Retrieved from

Barcelona, R. J., Hurd, A. R., & Bruggeman, J. A. (2011). A competency-based approach to preparing staff as recreation and youth development leaders. New Directions for Youth Development, 130, 121-139. DOI:

Berkowitz, M., & Hoppe, M. (2009). Character education and gifted children. High Ability Studies, 20(2), 131-142. DOI:

Bisland, A. (2004). Developing leadership skills in young gifted students. Gifted Child Today, 27, 24-27. DOI:

Boyd, B. (2000). Youth for community action: Leadership for inner-city youth. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED446199

Callahan, C., Cornell, D., & Lloyd, B. (1990). Perceived competence and parent-adolescent communication in high-ability adolescent females. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13,256-269. DOI:

Chan, D. W. (2000a). Developing the creative leadership training program for gifted and talented students in Hong Kong. Roeper Review, 22(2), 94-97. DOI:

Chan, D. W. (2000b). Assessing leadership among Chinese secondary students in Hong Kong: The use of the Roets Rating Scale for Leadership. Gifted Child Quarterly. 44, 115–122. DOI:

Chan, D. W. (2003). Leadership skills training for Chinese secondary students in Hong Kong: Does training make a difference? Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 14(3), 166-174. DOI:

Citamak, Y. &Yigit, H., I. (2012). From Student's Table to Teacher's Desk. International Journal of New Trends in Arts, Sports & Science Education, 1(2), 1-7.

Çokluk, Ö.,Yılmaz, K. & Oğuz, E. (2011). Nitel bir görüşme yöntemi: odak grup görüşmesi. [A qualitative interview method: focus group interview] Kuramsal Eğitimbilim, 4 (1), 95-107.

Covey, S.R. (2004). The 8th habit. New York: Free Press.

Cox, D., & Hoover, J. (1992). Leadership when the heat's on. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Davis, G. A. & Rimm, S. B. (2004). Education of the gifted and talented (5th ed) Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Demirel, Ş., & Sak, U. (2011). Yetenek hiyerarşisi: üstün yetenek türlerinin toplumsal değerleri üzerine bir araştırma [Talent hierarchy: A research study on the social value of talent types] Türk Üstün Zekâ ve Egitim Dergisi, 1(1), 61-76.

Demirhan, G., & Yücel, C. (2016). A Prediction for Teacher Commitment: Effects of Managerial Style, Burnout and Demographics, Research in Social Sciences and Technology, (I)1, 24-43. DOI:

Deniz, M., & Ersoy, E. (2016). Examining the Relationship of Social Skills, Problem Solving and Bullying in Adolescents. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 8(1), 1 -7. DOI:

Eccles, J., & Templeton, J. (2002). Extracurricular and other after-school activities for Youth. Review of Education, 26, 113-180. DOI:

Ersoy, E. (2015). Assessment of Adolescent Perceptions on Parental Attitudes on Different Variables. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(5), 165-176. DOI:

Ersoy, E., & Deniz, M. E. (2016). Psychometric Properties of the Gifted Students' Coping with Anger and Decision Making Skills Scale. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(15), 121-128.

Ersoy, E., & Deniz, M. E. (2016). Üstün Yetenekli Çocukların Öfkeyle Başa Çıkma ve Karar Verme Becerilerinin Bazı Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi. İlköğretim Online, 15(3), 1017-1030. DOI:

Ersoy, E., & Ugur, H. (2015). The Relationship between Students’ Self-esteem and Parental Attitudes in Turkish Society. The Anthropologist, 21(1-2), 112-119. DOI:

Fertman, C. I., & Long, J. A. (1990). All students are leaders. School Counselor, 37 (5), 391-396.

Fox, D. (2012). Teachers’ perceptions of leadership in young children (Doctoral dissertation). University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations.

Fox, D. L., Flynn, L., & Austin P. (2015). Child leadership: Teachers' perceptions and influences, Childhood Education, 91(3), 163-168, DOI: 10.1080/00094056.2015.1047306 DOI:

Fraenkel, J.R., & Wallen, N.E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Fulmer, R., & Goldsmith, M. (2000). The leadership investment: How the world’s best organizations gain strategic advantage through leadership development. New York: Amacon.

Gardner, H. (2011). Positioning future leaders on the good work track. In S. E. Murphy, & R. J. Reichard (Eds.), Early development and leadership: Building the next generation of leaders (pp. 255–272) . New York: Psychology Press/Routledge.

Gardner, J. W. (1990). On leadership. New York, NY: Free Press.

Hall, N. & Quinn, R. (2014). Parental Involvement at the High School Level: Parents’ Perspectives. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 1(1), 13-21. DOI:

Hancock, D., Dyk, P. H., & Jones, K. (2012). Adolescent involvement in extracurricular activities: Influences on leadership skills. Journal of Leadership Education, 11(1), 84-101. DOI:

Hoge, R. D., & Renzulli, J. S. (1993). Exploring the link between giftedness and self-concept. Review of Educational Research, 63, 449-465. DOI:

Houdyshellm, M. (2017). Academic integrity in an emerging democracy: How university students in a former Soviet Republic balance achievement and success in education. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 4(1), 14-25. DOI:

Jarosewich, T., Pfeiffer, S. I., & Morris, J. (2002). Identifying gifted students using teacher rating scales: A review of existing instruments. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 20, 322-336. DOI:

Karnes, F. A., & Bean, S. M. (1996). Leadership and the gifted. Focus on Exceptional Children, 29(1), 1–12. DOI:

Karnes, F. A., & Bean, S. M. (2001). Methods and materials for teaching the gifted. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

Karnes, F. A., & Stephens, K. R. (1999). Lead the way to leadership education. Digest, 64(8), 62–65.

Karnes, F. A., Meriweather, S., & D'Llio, V. (1987). The effectiveness of the leadership studies program. Roeper Review, 9(4), 238-241. DOI:

Kilinc, E. (2017). Review of Modernising school governance: Corporate planning and expert handling in state education. New York, NY: Routledge. 172 pp., ISBN-9781138787476..Research In Social Sciences And Technology, 2(2). Retrieved from DOI:

Kim, M., & Cho, S., & Jin, S. (2005). Grade and gender differences in creativity and leadership and the relationship of the two abilities. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 19, 799-820.

Kitzinger, J. (1995). Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups. British Medical Journal (BMJ), 311, 299-302. DOI:

Komives, S. R., Dugan, J. P., Owen, J. E., Slack, C., & Wagner, W. (2011). The handbook for student leadership development (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: JosseyBass.

Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2006). The leadership challenge (4th ed.). San. Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass

Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Kuş, E. (2007). Nicel-nitel araştırma teknikleri [Qualitative-quantitative research methods]. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.

Lafer, S.(2014). Democratic Design for the Humanization of Education. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 1(1), 6-12. DOI:

Lea-Wood, S. S., & Clunies-Ross, G. (1995). Self-esteem of gifted adolescent girls in Australian schools. Roeper Review, 17, 195-197. DOI:

Lee, S. Y., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2006). The emotional intelligence, moral judgment, and leadership of academically gifted adolescents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30(1), 29-67. DOI:

Lee, S. Y., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2011). Leadership development and gifted students. In R. J. Levesque, (Ed.) Encyclopedia of adolescence (pp. 1557-1565). New York: Springer DOI:

Marsh, H. W. (1989). Age and sex effects in multiple dimensions of self-concept: Preadolescence to early adulthood. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 417-430. DOI:

Martinek, T., Schilling, T., & Hellison, D. (2006). The development of compassionate and caring leadership among adolescents. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 11, 141-157. DOI:

Matthews, M. S. (2004). Leadership education for gifted and talented youth: A review of the literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28(1), 77-113. DOI:

McCarthy, J. D. & Hoge, D. R. (1982). Analysis of age effects in longitudinal studies of adolescent self-esteem. Developmental Psychology, 18, 372-79. DOI:

McNeill, B. (2010). The important role non-parental adults have with youth learning leadership. Journal of Extension, 48 (5), 1-4.

Michou, A., Mouratidis, A., Ersoy, E., & Uğur, H. (2016). Social achievement goals, needs satisfaction, and coping among adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 260-265. DOI:

Milligan, J. (2004). Leadership skills of gifted students in a rural setting: Promising programs for leadership development. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 23 (1), 16-22. DOI:

Ministry of National Education (2015). Bilim ve Sanat Merkezleri Yönergesi. Retrieved April 29, 2011 from

Muammar, O. M. (2015). The differences between intellectually gifted and average students on a set of leadership competencies. Gifted Education International, 31(2), 142-153. DOI:

Mullarkey, L. S., Recchia, S. L., Lee, S. Y., Shin, M. S., & Lee, Y. J. (2005). Manipulative managers and devilish dictators: Teachers’ perspectives on the dilemmas and challenges of classroom leadership. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 25(2), 123-129. DOI:

Northouse, P. G. (2013). Leadership theory and practice (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Ogurlu, U., & Emir, S. (2014). Effects of a leadership development program on gifted and non-gifted students’ leadership skills. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research (EJER), 55, 223-242. DOI:

Ornstein, A., Levine, D., Gutek, G., & Vocke, D. (2011). Foundations of Education. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Parker, J. P., & Begnaud, L.G. (2004). Developing creative

leadership. Portsmouth, NH: Teacher Ideas Press.

Pfeiffer, S. I., & Wechsler, S. M. (2013). Youth leadership: A proposal for identifying and developing creativity and giftedness. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas), 30(2), 219-229. DOI:

Plucker, J. A. & Callahan, C. M. (2008).Critical issues and practices in gifted education: What the research says. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press Inc.

Renzulli, J. S., & D’Souza, S. (2014). Intelligences outside the normal curve: Co-cognitive factors that contribute to the creation of social capital and leadership skills in young people. In J. A. Plucker & C. M. Callahan (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education: What the research says (pp. 343–362). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

Roets, L. (1992). Leadership: A skills training program. Des Moines: Leadership Publishers Inc.

Rosch, D., & Meixner, C. (2011). Powerful pedagogies. In S. R. Komives, J. P. Dugan, J. E. Owen, C. Slack, & W. Wagner (Eds.) The handbook for student leadership development (pp. 307-337). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Rosebrough, T. R., & Leverett, R. G. (2011) Transformational teaching in the information age: Making why and how we teach relevant to students. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Sacks, R. (2009). Natural born leaders: An exploration of leadership development in children and adolescents. Ottawa, Canada: Heritage.

Sak, U., Ayas, M.B., Sezerel, B.B., Öpengin, E., Özdemir, N.N., & Gürbüz, S.D. (2015) Türkiye'de üstün yeteneklilerin egitiminin elestirel bir değerlendirmesi [Gifted and talented education in Turkey: Critics and prospects] Türk Üstün Zekâ ve Egitim Dergisi, 5(2), 110-132.

Sisk, D. A. (1993). Leadership education for the gifted. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 491-505). New York: Pergamon.

Sisk, D., Gilbert, P., & Gosh, R. (1991). Developing leadership in a multicultural society. Gifted Child Today, 14(4), 60-61. DOI:

Slavich, G. M. (2006). Transformational teaching. In T. Zinn, B. Saville, & J. Williams (Eds.), Essays from excellence in teaching (Vol. 5). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Smith, D. L., Smith, L., & Barnette, J. (1991). Exploring the development of leadership giftedness. Roeper Review, 14(1), 7-12. DOI:

Smyth, E., & Ross, J. A. (1999). Developing leadership skills of pre-adolescent gifted learners in small group settings. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43(3), 204-211. DOI:

Stephens, K. R. (2008). Applicable federal and state policy, law and legal considerations in gifted education. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children: Psychoeducational theory, research, and best practices. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. DOI:

Sternberg, R. (2008). The WICS approach to leadership: Stories of leadership and the structure and process that support them. The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 360-371. DOI:

Sternberg, R. J. (2005). WICS: A model of giftedness in leadership. Roeper Review, 28(1), 37-44. DOI:

Summers, P.P. (2000). The roots of leadership. Psychology: A Journal of Human Behavior, 37(1), 27-36.

Tarman, B. (2016). Innovation and education. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 1(1), 77-97. DOI:

Tarman, B. (2017). Editorial: The Future of Social Sciences. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 2(2). Retrieved from DOI:

Van Linden, J. A., & Fertman, C. I. (1998). Youth leadership: A guide to understanding leadership development in adolescents. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Velsor, E.V., & Wright, J. (2012). Expanding the leadership equation: Developing next-generation leaders. Retrieved from Center for Creative Leadership. Alınan yer:

Vidergor, H. E., & Sisk, D. A. (2013). Enhancing the gift of leadership: Innovative programs for all grade levels. Ulm, Germany: International Center for Innovation in Education.

Wade, R. C. (1997). Community service learning. New York, NY: State University of New York Press.

Yildirim, A., & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemi [Qualitative methods in social sicences] (6th Ed.). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.

Yurt, E., & Polat, S. (2015). The effectiveness of multiple intelligence applications on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 6(1), 84-122. doi:10.17499/jsser.75161 DOI:

Zimmerman, B. J. (2006). Enhancing students’ academic responsibility and achievements: A social-cognitive self-regulatory account. In R. J. Sternberg, & R. Subotnik (Eds.), Optimizing student success in school with the other three Rs: Reasoning, resilience, and responsibility (pp. 179-197). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.




How to Cite

Ogurlu, U., & Sevim, M. N. (2017). The Opinions of Gifted Students about Leadership Training. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 4(2), 41–52.



Original Manuscript
Received 2017-08-18
Accepted 2017-10-16
Published 2017-12-29

Most read articles by the same author(s)