Population and Civil Registration as the Spearhead of Inclusive and Effective Domestic Governance
Keywords:
Population and Civil Registration, Domestic Governance, State Capacity, Digital Governance, InclusionAbstract
Population and civil registration systems are increasingly recognized as foundational to effective governance. Yet, they are often examined as technical or sector-specific administrative functions rather than as core governance infrastructures. This study examines population and civil registration as pillars of inclusive and effective domestic governance in Indonesia, a decentralized, digitally transforming middle-income country. Using a qualitative documentary case study approach, the research analyses legal frameworks, policy documents, and peer-reviewed academic literature through an integrated theoretical lens combining state capacity theory, whole-of-government approaches, and digital governance theory. The findings reveal that population and civil registration enhance governance capacity by improving administrative visibility, facilitating intergovernmental coordination, and supporting the integration of digital governance. However, these benefits are conditional and influenced by institutional capacity, governance safeguards, and legitimacy, with persistent risks of exclusion and uneven implementation across regions. By conceptualizing population and civil registration as a governance capability rather than a purely administrative service, this study advances theoretical understanding of identity systems in public administration. It offers policy-relevant insights for strengthening inclusive and effective domestic governance in decentralized contexts.
Downloads
References
AbouZahr, C., De Savigny, D., Mikkelsen, L., Setel, P. W., Lozano, R., Nichols, E., Notzon, F., & Lopez, A. D. (2015). Civil registration and vital statistics: Progress in the data revolution for counting and accountability. The Lancet, 386(10001), 1373-1385. https://doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60173-8
Acev, D., Biyani, S., Rieder, F., Aldenhoff, T. T., Blazevic, M., Riehle, D. M., & Wimmer, M. A. (2025). Systematic analysis of data governance frameworks and their relevance to data trusts. Management Review Quarterly, 1-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-025-00545-1
Alfarizy, M. F., & Balahmar, A. R. U. (2025). Effectiveness of SIAK (Population Administration Information System) in population administration services. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Science and Humanity, 2(2), 1722-1736. https://doi.org/10.61796/icossh.v2i2.475
Alvember, M., & Asri, D. P. B. (2025). Analisis keamanan data pribadi konsumen terhadap regulasi pencantuman nomor induk kependudukan untuk registrasi nomor telepon [Analysis of consumer personal data security in relation to regulations mandating the submission of national identity numbers for mobile phone registration]. Arus Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora, 5(2), 3017-3026. https://doi.org/10.57250/ajsh.v5i2.1590
Annahar, N., Widianingsih, I., Muhtar, E. A., & Paskarina, C. (2023). The road to inclusive decentralized village governance in Indonesia. Sustainability, 15(11), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118616
Ateh, M. Y., Berman, E., & Prasojo, E. (2020). Intergovernmental strategies advancing performance management use. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(5), 993-1024. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1736588
Beduschi, A. (2021). Rethinking digital identity for post-COVID-19 societies: Data privacy and human rights considerations. Data & Policy, 3, 1-14. https://doi:10.1017/ dap.2021.15
Bera, O. P., Shah, V., Chandge, M., Singh, R., Singh, A., Kumari, L., & Shrama, S. (2025). Civil registration, legal reforms, public health, and SDG 16.9: Catalyzing social inclusion for transgender persons in India. Indian Journal of Community Health, 37(1), 15-21. https://doi.org/10.47203/IJCH.2025.v37i01.004
Bernot, A., Tjondronegoro, D., Rifai, B., Hasan, R., Liew, A. W.-C., Verhelst, T., & Tiwari, M. (2024). Institutional dimensions in open government data: A deep dive into Indonesia’s Satu Data Initiative and its implications for developing countries. Public Performance & Management Review, 47(6), 1399-1429. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 15309576.2024.2377609
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Breckenridge, K. (2021). Documentary government and mathematical identification: On the theoretical significance of African biometric government. In S. A. Dalberto & R. Banégas (Eds.), Identification and citizenship in Africa (pp. 49-64). Routledge.
Bug, M., Gerlspeck, M., Grassl, A.-V., Metz, S., Vogel, J. S., Wicke, C., & Subramanian, S. V. (2025). Sanitation governance and its implications on environmental health in Nakuru City, Kenya. IDOS Studies No. 108. German Institute of Development and Sustainability, Bonn. https://https://doi.org/10.23661/is108.2025
Charmaz, K. (2017). Constructivist grounded theory. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 299-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262612
Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2011). Complexity and hybrid public administration—Theoretical and empirical challenges. Public Organization Review, 11(4), 407-423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-010-0141-4
Clark, S., & Wylie, R. (2021). Surviving a cultural genocide: Perspectives of indigenous elders on the transfer of traditional values. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 8(2), 316-346. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48710317
Cordella, A., & Tempini, N. (2015). E-government and organizational change: Reappraising the role of ICT and bureaucracy in public service delivery. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 279-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.03.005
Darin, E. (2025). Demographic figures at risk in the digital era: Resisting commodification, reclaiming the common good. Big Data & Society, 12(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517251403948
Diprose, R. (2023). Brokerage, power and gender equity: How empowerment‐focused civil society organisations bolster women's influence in rural Indonesia. Journal of International Development, 35(3), 401-425. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3770
Djatmiko, G. H., Sinaga, O., & Pawirosumarto, S. (2025). Digital transformation and social inclusion in public services: A qualitative analysis of e-government adoption for marginalized communities in sustainable governance. Sustainability, 17(7), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17072908
Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 160940690600500107
Fitriyanti, E. (2024). The effect of digital transformation on governance in Indonesia: A case study of e-government implementation in public services. Journal of Political Innovation and Analysis, 1(1), 26-32. https://doi.org/10.59261/jpia.v1i1.3
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219-245. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1504-2928-2004-02-02
Fukuyama, F. (2013). What is governance? Governance, 26(3), 347-368. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12035
George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press.
Gil-Garcia, J. R., Dawes, S. S., & Pardo, T. A. (2018). Digital government and public management research: Finding the crossroads. Public Management Review, 20(5), 633-646. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1327181
Hadiz, V. R., & Robison, R. (2017). Competing populisms in post-authoritarian Indonesia. International Political Science Review, 38(4), 488-502. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0192512117697475
Handoko, I., & Nugroho, A. (2024). The adoption of virtual technology in museums: The case of a modern and contemporary museum in Indonesia. Museum Management and Curatorship, 39(1), 106-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2023.2225167
Hartono, S., Al Musadieq, M., Rahardjo, K., & Afrianty, T. W. (2023). The critical factors affecting the implementation of corporate governance in Indonesia: A structural equation modeling analysis. Economies, 11(5), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ economies11050139
Hasanudin, M., Ruhaeni, N., Yusdiansah, E., & Chotidjah, N. (2025). Reformulating governor elections between popular sovereignty and government effectiveness in Indonesia’s decentralised system. Walisongo Law Review (Walrev), 7(2), 215-232. https://doi.org/10.21580/walrev.2024.6.2.27332
Hastono, D. W., & Ratnasari, M. (2020). Social return on investment (SROI) for civil society organization (CSO) in Indonesia (A case study of Rumah Dongeng Pelangi). Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 149, 202–205. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200812.034
Hermanto, B., Ibrahim Nur, A., & Subawa, M. (2024). Indonesia parliamentary reform and legislation quality backsliding phenomenon: Case of Indonesia post reformasi. The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 12(1), 73-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840. 2024.2316507
Hidayat, A. R., Hospes, O., & Termeer, C. (2025). Why democratization and decentralization in Indonesia have mixed results on the ground: A systematic literature review. Public Administration and Development, 45(2), 159-172. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.2095
Hm, A. (2021). Cultural pluralism and social connectedness as predictors of immigrant students’ social wellbeing and achievements. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 8(4), 154-170. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48710099
Irawan, I. (2023). Advocacy strategies of civil society organisations in decentralised Indonesia: An exploration using a Policy Window Framework. Khazanah Sosial, 5(3), 534-550. https://doi.org/10.15575/ks.v5i3.29547
Jacobs, L. (2024). Access to administrative justice as an administrative law value: Designing an inclusive and accessible administrative justice system. Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice, 40, 158-183. https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1115369ar
Janssen, M., Brous, P., Estevez, E., Barbosa, L. S., & Janowski, T. (2020). Data governance: Organizing data for trustworthy artificial intelligence. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101493
Khaerah, N., Fatmawati, F., Hawing, H., & Hardi, R. (2025). Strategic co-creation and synergistic partnerships in digital budgeting reform: strengthening public governance for sustainable cities in Makassar, Indonesia. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 7, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2025.1716088
Kusumaningrum, D. E., Sumarsono, R. B., & Gunawan, I. (2019). Professional ethics and teacher teaching performance: Measurement of teacher empowerment with a soft system methodology approach. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 5(4), 611-624. https://www.ijicc.net/images/vol5iss4/Pt_2/54216_ Kusumaningrum_2019_E_R.pdf
Lewis, B. D., & Smoke, P. (2017). Intergovernmental fiscal transfers and local incentives and responses: The case of Indonesia. Fiscal Studies, 38(1), 111-139. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5890.12080
Lyon, D. (2014). Surveillance, Snowden, and big data: Capacities, consequences, critique. Big Data & Society, 1(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714541861
Mahardhika, J. C. (2023). Socio-economical characteristics and determinants of Indonesian national health insurance subsidized by the government in Jakarta. Medical Clinical Update, 2(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.58376/mcu.v2i1.20
Malhotra, C., & Anand, R. (2020, September 23-25). Accelerating public service delivery in India: Application of internet of things and artificial intelligence in agriculture [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV 2020), Athens, Greece. https://dl.acm.org/doi/proceedings/10.1145/3428502
Manby, B. (2018). Statelessness and citizenship in the east african community. UNHCR Regional Service Centre, Nairobi, Kenya. https://www.refworld.org/reference/research/unhcr/2018/en/122374
Margetts, H., & Dunleavy, P. (2013). The second wave of digital-era governance: A quasi-paradigm for government on the Web. Philosophical Transactions: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 371(1987), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0382
Martin, A., & Taylor, L. (2021). Exclusion and inclusion in identification: Regulation, displacement and data justice. Information Technology for Development, 27(1), 50-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2020.1811943
Masiero, S., & Arvidsson, V. (2021). Degenerative outcomes of digital identity platforms for development. Information Systems Journal, 31(6), 903–928. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12351
McDonnell, E. M. (2025). Bureaucracy in action: The sociology of public administration. Annual Review of Sociology, 51, 191-211. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-091324-053657
Mikkelsen, L., Hooper, J., Adair, T., Badr, A., & Lopez, A. D. (2023). Comparative performance of national civil registration and vital statistics systems: A global assessment. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 101(12), 758-767. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.22.289033
Ndiyun, R. K., & Mukonza, R. M. (2025). Digital transformation of civil registration system in Cameroon: Innovations in e-governance. Journal of Digital Technologies and Law, 3(1), 7-34. https://doi.org/10.21202/jdtl.2025.1
O'Leary, Z., & Hunt, J. (2017). Secondary data: Existing data, online generated data and previous studies. In Z. O'Leary (Ed.), The essential guide to doing your research project (3rd ed., pp. 264-294). SAGE Publications.
Prior, L. (2003). Using documents in social research. SAGE Publications
Rachmawati, R., Anjani, D. F., Nurwidiani, T., & Almasari, H. (2022). Electronically-based governance system for public services: Implementation in the special region of Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Human Geographies, 16(1), 71-86. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6987/a53ffcf0ba0d07052948f8a85f6eddffd7ed.pdf
Rothstein, B. (2011). The quality of government: Corruption, social trust, and inequality in international perspective. University of Chicago Press.
https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226729589.001.0001
Saptenno, M. J., & Timisela, N. R. (2024). Assessing the role of local Sasi practices in environmental conservation and community economic empowerment in Maluku, Indonesia. International Journal of Sustainable Development & Planning, 19(4) 1407-1413. https://10.18280/ijsdp.190418
Schneider, A. L., & Ingram, H. M. (2019). Social constructions, anticipatory feedback strategies, and deceptive public policy. Policy Studies Journal, 47(2), 206-236. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12281
Scott, J. E. (1998). Organizational knowledge and the intranet. Decision Support Systems, 23(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(98)00032-3
Shrestha, P., & Bhattarai, P. C. (2022). Application of Case Study Methodology in the Exploration of Inclusion in Education. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 6(1), 73-84. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/11461
Siburian, M. E. (2024). Fiscal decentralization and corruption: A case of Indonesia. Applied Economics Letters, 31(1), 87-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2022.2128164
Syafitri, I., Nurman, N., & Mardatillah, A. (2025). Efficiency of population administration services based on digital identity: An integrative analysis from the perspective of Islamic values in Riau Province. Administratio, 16(1), 101-120. https://doi.org/10.23960/administratio.v16i1.487
Syakur, A., & Khoiroh, M. (2021). Local wisdom for civil religious harmony in Indonesia: An ethnographic investigation on Mbah Moni's grave ritual in Babatan village, Wiyung sub-district, Surabaya city, Jawa Timur province. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 42(3), 674–681.
Tilly, C. (1992). Coercion, capital, and European states, AD 990-1992 (Vol. 29). Blackwell Oxford.
Tjiptoherijanto, P. (2018). Reform of the Indonesian civil service: Looking for quality. Economics World, 6(6), 433-443. https://doi: 10.17265/2328-7144/2018.06.002
Weitzberg, K., Cheesman, M., Martin, A., & Schoemaker, E. (2021). Between surveillance and recognition: Rethinking digital identity in aid. Big Data & Society, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211006744
Wicaksono, T. T. (2023). The urgency of human rights approach for the Indonesian ombudsman for combating discrimination. Southeast Asian Journal of Advanced Law and Governance (SEAJ ALGOV), 1(1), 76-94. https://doi.org/10.22146/ seajalgov.v1i1.10152
Yilmaz, I., & Saleem, R. M. A. (2023). Digital governance and religious populism in Pakistan. In I. Yilmaz (Ed.), Digital authoritarianism and its religious legitimization: The cases of Turkey, Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan, and India (pp. 109-130). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3600-7_5
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (Vol. 6). SAGE Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Gatiningsih, Romi Saputra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
