Inclusive STEM High School Factors Influencing Ethnic Minority Students’ STEM Preparation


Abstract views: 958 / PDF downloads: 547

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/384

Keywords:

ethnic minority students, inclusive STEM high schools, STEM schools, T-STEM academies, underrepresented students

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to better understand school factors influencing ethnic minority students’ science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) preparation in Inclusive STEM High Schools (ISHSs). The researchers conducted a phenomenological study that used semi-structured interviews with participants (N=13) who graduated from ISHSs in Texas. Participants’ STEM high school experiences were classified into nine categories: a) innovative STEM and non-STEM instruction, b) rigorous STEM curriculum, c) integration of technology and engineering in classrooms, d) quality of teachers, e) real-world STEM partnership, f) informal STEM opportunities, g) academic and social support for struggling students, h) emphasis on STEM courses, majors, and careers, and i) preparation for a college workload. These characteristics can be helpful for schools to establish a STEM-focused school environment and have the potential to cultivate positive experiences for ethnic minority students to increase their interest and capabilities in STEM fields.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Ali Bicer, University of Wyoming

After Ali Bicer graduated from high school, he was admitted to the Mathematics Department at Celal Bayar University in 2002 and graduated in 2006. After graduation, he worked as a high school mathematics teacher three years. In  2008, he applied for a Ministry of National Education Scholarship to pursue master’s and doctoral degrees in Mathematics Education. In 2009, he attended the Intensive English Language  Program  of  Indiana University  in  Bloomington. After he completed his English Language Program, he started his masters in Mathematics Education at Texas A&M University and graduated in May 2012. He then began work on his PhD in Mathematics Education at Texas A&M University. He has served as the STEM Summer Camp Assistant Director for two years. In addition, he has taught students in the camp as well as assisting with teacher professional development. His honors include the Lechner Scholarship and the College of Education Graduate Strategic Support Scholarship. As a graduate student, he has distinguished himself through his extensive publications on STEM teaching and learning and has participated in the writing of several grant proposals. During his education he attended several educational research conferences including AERA, NCTM, and SERA. He earned several publications including journal articles, book chapters, and conference proceedings. In 2016, he graduated from Texas A&M University as a graduate student who had the highest number of publications in the program so far. After receiving his PhD in Mathematics Education from Texas A&M University, he started working as a postdoctoral research assistant in Aggie STEM at Texas A&M University. As of today, he is both teaching mathematics education courses and conducting rigorous research in the field at Texas A&M University. With his background, he is on track to become a successful mathematics educator and scholar.

Yujin Lee, University of North Dakota

Curriculum design and evaluation in STEM education, STEM teacher professional identity, affective mathematics engagement, innovative instructional practices, and large-scale national/international data

Celal Perihan, Idaho State University

Educational Psychology; emotional behavior disorders and positive behavioral support.

References

Anyon, J. (1981). Social class and school knowledge. Curriculum Inquiry, 11(1), 3-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.1981.11075236

Arcidiacono, P. (2004). Ability sorting and the returns to college major. Journal of Econometrics, 121(1-2), 343-375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2003.10.010

Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college: Four critical years revisited. Jossey-Bass.

Bicer, A., & Capraro, R. M. (2019). Mathematics achievement in the secondary high school context of STEM and non-STEM Schools. School Science and Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12321 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12321

Bicer, A., Boedeker, P., Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M. (2015). The effects of STEM PBL on students’ mathematical and scientific vocabulary knowledge. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 2(2), 69-75.

Bicer, A., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2018). Hispanic students' mathematics achievement in the context of their high school types as STEM and non-STEM schools. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology (TMES). https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2017.1410735 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2017.1410735

Bicer, A., Navruz, B., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2014). STEM schools vs. non-STEM schools: Comparing students’ mathematics state-based test performance. International Journal of Global Education, 3(3), 8-18.

Bicer, A., Navruz, B., Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., Oner, T. A., & Boedeker, P. (2015). STEM schools vs. non-STEM schools: Comparing students' mathematics growth rate on high-stakes test performance. International Journal of New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 6(1), 138-150.

Bittman, B., Davies, A., Russell, W., & Goussakova, E. (2017). Advance Placement and The Achievement Gap in the 21st Century: A Multiple Linear Regression of Marginalized Populations in AP Enrollment. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.02.02.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.02.02.2

Bloom, A. J. (1985). An anxiety management approach to computerphobia. Training and Development Journal, 39(1), 90-4.

Bowen, W. G., Chingos, M. M., & McPherson, M. S. (2009). Crossing the finish line: Completing college at America's public universities (Vol. 52). Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400831463

Brownell, C., & Rashid, A. (2020). Building Bridges Instead of Walls: Engaging Young Children in Critical Literacy Read Alouds. Journal Of Curriculum Studies Research, 2(1), 76-94. https://doi.org/10.46303/jcsr.02.01.5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46303/jcsr.02.01.5

Capraro, R. M., & Slough, S. W. (2013). Why PBL? Why STEM? Why now? An introduction to STEM project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach. In STEM project-based learning (pp. 1-5). Brill Sense. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-143-6_1

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.

Dewey, J. (1998). Experience and Education. Kappa Delta PI.

Eisenhart, M., Weis, L., Allen, C. D., Cipollone, K., Stich, A., & Dominguez, R. (2015). High school opportunities for STEM: Comparing inclusive STEM focused and comprehensive high schools in two US cities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(6), 763-789. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21213

Gairola, R. (2019). Attitudes of secondary teacher trainees towards entrepreneurial education. Research in Educational Policy and Management, 1(1), 44-54. https://doi.org/10.46303/repam.01.01.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46303/repam.01.01.4

García-Martínez, I., Pérez-Ferra, M., Ubago-Jiménez, J. L., & Quijano-López, R. (2019). Promoting Professional Development for Teachers Through a Scale of Competence Assessment. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 4(2), 147-162. https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.04.02.11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.04.02.11

Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). Grounded theory: The discovery of grounded theory. Sociology, 12, 27-49.

Gnagey, J., & Lavertu, S. (2016). The impact of inclusive STEM high schools on student achievement. AERA Open, 2(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858416650870

Henson, K. T. (2003). Foundations for learner-centered education: A knowledge base. Education, 124(1), 5–16.

LaForce, M., Noble, E., King, H., Century, J., Blackwell, C., Holt, S., Ibrahim, A., & Loo, S. (2016). The eight essential elements of inclusive STEM high schools. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(21), 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0054-z

Legewie, J., & DiPrete, T. A. (2014). The high school environment and the gender gap in science and engineering. Sociology of Education, 87(4), 259-280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040714547770

Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027

Lesseig, K., Firestone, J., Morrison, J., Slavit, D., & Holmlund, T. (2019). An analysis of cultural influences on STEM schools: Similarities and differences across K-12 contexts. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(3), 449-466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9875-6

Lincoln, Y. S, & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8

Lynch, S. J., Peters-Burton, E., Behrend, T., House, A., Ford, M., Spillane, N., Matray, S., & Means, S. (2017). Understanding inclusive STEM high schools as opportunity structures for underrepresented students: Critical components. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21437 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21437

Ma, X., & McIntyre, L. J. (2005). Exploring differential effects of mathematics courses on mathematics achievement. Canadian Journal of Education, 28, 827-852. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4126457

McCorkle, W.D. (2020). The Relationship Between Teachers’ Grade Level and Views on Immigration and Immigrant Students. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 11(1), 21-41. Retrieved from https://jsser.org/index.php/jsser/article/view/1771

Means, B., Wang, H., Wei, X., Iwatani, E., & Peters, V. (2018). Broadening participation in STEM college majors: Effects of attending a STEM-focused high school. AERA Open, 4(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418806305

Means, B., Wang, H., Wei, X., Lynch, S., Peters, V., Young, V., & Allen, C. (2017). Expanding STEM opportunities through inclusive STEM-focused high schools. Science Education, 101(5), 681-715. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21281

Means, B., Wang, H., Young, V., Peters, V. & Lynch, S. J. (2016). STEM-focused high schools as a strategy for enhancing readiness for postsecondary STEM programs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(5), 709-736. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21313

National Research Council. (2011). Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. The National Academies Press.

Navruz, B., Capraro, R. M., Bicer, A., & Capraro, M. M. (2014). A review of higher-order factor analysis interpretation strategies. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 6(1), 72-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.72637

LaPaglia, K. (2018). Book Review: Critical pedagogy: Notes from the real world. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 2(2), 150-153.

Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd ed.). Sage.

Peña, C., Jones, L., Orange, A., Simieou, F., & Márquez, J. (2018). Academic success and resiliency factors: A case study of unaccompanied immigrant children. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 2(1), 161-181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/5797

Peters-Burton, E. E., Lynch, S. J., Behrend, T. S., & Means, B. B. (2014). Inclusive STEM high school design: 10 critical components. Theory into Practice, 53(1), 64-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2014.862125

Pink, D. H. (2006). A whole new mind: Why right-brainers will rule the future. Riverhead Books.

Porter, S. R., & Umbach, P. D. (2006). College major choice: An analysis of person– environment fit. Research in Higher Education, 47(4), 429-449. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-9002-3

Pyryt, M. C. (2000). Talent development in science and technology. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. Subotnik, & R. Sternberg (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 427-437). Pergamon. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008043796-5/50030-9

Roberts, K. (2009). Opportunity structures then and now. Journal of Education and Work, 22(5), 355-368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080903453987

Rossman, G. B., & Rallis, S. F. (1998). Learning in the field. Sage.

Sahin, A., Erdogan, N., Morgan, J., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2012). The effects of high school course taking and SAT scores on college major selection. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 2(3), 96-109.

Saw, G. K. (2018). The impact of inclusive STEM high schools on student outcomes: A statewide longitudinal evaluation of Texas STEM academies. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-09942-3

Sim, J. & Sharp, K. A. (1998). Critical appraisal of the role of triangulation in nursing research. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 35, 23–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7489(98)00014-5

Soldner, M., Rowan-Kenyon, H., Inkelas, K. K., Garvey, J., & Robbins, C. (2012). Supporting students' intentions to persist in STEM disciplines: The role of living-learning programs among other social-cognitive factors. The Journal of Higher Education, 83(3), 311-336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2012.0017

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications, Inc.

Subotnik, R. F., Duschl, R. A., & Selmon, E. H. (1993). Retention and attrition of science talent: A longitudinal study of Westinghouse Science Talent Search winners. International Journal of Science Education, 15(1), 61-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069930150105

Subotnik, R. F., Tai, R. H., Rickoff, R., & Almarode, J. T. (2010). Specialized public high schools of science, mathematics, and technology and the STEM pipeline: What do we know now and what will we know in five years? Roeper Review, 32, 7-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190903386553

Tai, R. H., Liu, C. Q., Maltese, A. V., & Fan, X. (2006). Planning early for careers in science. Science, 312, 1143-1144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1128690

Tarman, B. (2018). The Awareness of Social Studies Teacher Candidates’ Regarding Special Area Competencies and the Overlap Level of These Competencies with Social Studies Degree, Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 5 (2), 16-28.

Tyson, W., Lee, R., Borman, K. M., & Hanson, M. A. (2007). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) pathways: High school science and math coursework and postsecondary degree attainment. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 12(3), 243-270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10824660701601266

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the development of children, 23(3), 34-41.

Woofter, S. (2019). Book Review: Building Equity: Policies and Practices to Empower All Learners. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 3(1), 136-139. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/5815 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/5815

Young, V. M., House, A., Wang, H., Singleton, C., & Klopfenstein, K. (2011, May). Inclusive STEM schools: Early promise in Texas and unanswered questions [Paper presentation]. National Research Council Workshop on Successful STEM Education in K-12 Schools, National Academies. http://www7.nationalacademies.org/bose/STEMSchools_Workshop_Paper_Young.pdf

Downloads

Published

2020-07-11

How to Cite

Bicer, A., Lee, Y., & Perihan, C. (2020). Inclusive STEM High School Factors Influencing Ethnic Minority Students’ STEM Preparation. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 7(2), 147–172. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/384

Issue

Section

Original Manuscript
Received 2020-06-15
Accepted 2020-07-05
Published 2020-07-11

Most read articles by the same author(s)