Yang’s Cultural-Ecological Psychology: A Perspective for Interpreting Cultural Change

Matthew McWhorter

doi:10.29333/ejecs/2315

Authors

Matthew McWhorter Divine Mercy University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6401-7325

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/2315

Keywords:

Kuo-Shu Yang, cultural ecological psychology, cultural change, adaptation, modernization, social structures, acculturation, cultural integration

Abstract

Kuo-Shu Yang (d. 2018) developed a cultural-ecological psychology when researching how personality traits can change under the influence of environmental factors. Such factors can include sociocultural values that might affect personality dispositions and behavior. Within this general perspective, Yang also developed two supplemental theories: (1) a cultural theory of personality motivation that expands on the psychology of Abraham Maslow, and (2) a cultural theory of personality development in which Yang describes the various kinds of adaptation responses that persons exhibit when they encounter cultural change. With respect to such adaptation responses, Yang indicates that the response of cultural integration can support a person’s health and continued social functioning. In order to facilitate an acculturation response of integration, Yang recommends the indigenization of new cultural values. In this way, Yang proposes that empirical methods can be indigenized by researchers when they develop culturally-integrated approaches to inquiry in the human sciences.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Matthew McWhorter, Divine Mercy University

Dr. Matthew McWhorter is an Associate Professor in the Department of Integration at Divine Mercy University. His work examines the topics of cultural psychology, religious psychology, moral psychology, and cognitive psychology. He is interested in exploring how these various domains might become interconnected during processes of education and personality development.

References

Allwood, C. M. (2019). Future prospects for indigenous psychologies. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 39(2), 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/teo0000108

Allwood, C. M. (2020). Yang’s global psychology and beyond. In L. Sundararajan, K-K. Hwang, & K-H. Yeh (Eds.), Global psychology from indigenous perspectives: Visions inspired by K. S. Yang (pp. 111–128). Palgrave Macmillan.

Allwood, C. M., & Berry, J. W. (2006). Origins and development of indigenous psychologies: An international analysis. International Journal of Psychology, 41(4), 243–268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207590544000013

Bacon, F. (2016). New atlantis and great instauration (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. (Original work published 1620–1626)

Benet-Martínez, V., Leu, J., Lee, F., & Morris, M. W. (2002). Negotiating biculturalism: Cultural frame shifting in biculturals with oppositional versus compatible identities. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(5), 492–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022102033005005

Berry, J. W. (1976). Human ecology and cognitive style: Comparative studies in cultural and psychological adaptation. Sage Publications.

Berry, J. W. (1989). Imposed etics-emics-derived etics: The operationalization of a compelling idea. International Journal of Psychology, 24(6), 721–735. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207598908247841

Berry, J. W. (1994). Ecology of individualism and collectivism. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, Ç. Kâğitçibaşi, S-C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 77–84). Sage Publications.

Berry, J. W. (2018). Ecocultural perspective on human behavior. In A. K. Üskül & S. Oishi (Eds.), Socio-economic environment and human psychology: Social, ecological, and cultural perspectives (pp. 3–32). Oxford University Press.

Berry, J. W. (2019). Acculturation. Cambridge University Press.

Berry, J. W. (2023). Living together in culturally diverse societies. Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne, 64(3), 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000362

Bond, M. (2020). My academic journey with Kuo-Shu Yang: Traveling more widely and more deeply into Chinese culture. In L. Sundararajan, K-K. Hwang, & K-H. Yeh (Eds.), Global psychology from indigenous perspectives: Visions inspired by K. S. Yang (pp. 9– 32). Palgrave Macmillan.

Buss, D. M. (1984). Evolutionary biology and personality psychology: Toward a conception of human nature and individual differences. American Psychologist, 39(10), 1135–1147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.10.1135

Castro, V. S. (2003). Acculturation and psychological adaptation. Greenwood Press.

Chakkarath, P. (2024). The indigenous psychological perspective. In U. Wolfradt, L. Allolio- Näcke, P. S. Ruppel (Eds.), Cultural psychology: An introduction (pp. 73–81). Springer.

Chan, W-T. (1963). A source book in Chinese philosophy. Princeton University Press.

de Oliveira, S., & Nisbett, R. E. (2017). Culture changes how we think about thinking: From “human inference” to “geography of thought”. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(5), 782–790. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916177027

Dueck, A. (2020). Indigenous psychologies of spirituality: Remembering, excavating, and individuating. In The psychology of world religions and spiritualities: An indigenous perspective (pp. 29–58). Templeton Press.

Dueck, A., & Marossy, M. (2019). A future for indigenous psychology of spirituality? Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 39(2), 120–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/teo0000116

Enriquez, V. G. (1977). Filipino psychology in the third world. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 10(1), 3–18.

Enriquez, V. G. (1979). Towards cross-cultural knowledge through cross-indigenous methods and perspective. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 12(1), 9–15.

Flores, L. Y., & Lee, H-S. (2019). Assessment of positive psychology constructs across cultures. In Positive psychological assessment: A handbook of models and measures (2nd ed.) (pp. 45–58). American Psychological Association.

Gabrenya, Jr., W. K., & Sun, C-R. (2015). Kuo-Shu Yang: Scholar, leader, activist. In G. J. Rich & U. P. Gielen (Eds.), Pathfinders in international psychology (pp. 201–212). Information Age Publishing.

Giles, H. A. (1901). A history of Chinese literature. D. Appleton and Company.

Gowans, C. W. (2021). Self-cultivation philosophies in ancient India, Greece, and China. Oxford University Press.

Hong, Y-Y., Morris, M. W., Chiu, C-Y., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2000). Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. American Psychologist, 55(7), 709–720. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.7.709

Hwang, K-K. (2003). In search of a new paradigm for cultural psychology. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 6(3), 287–291. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-839X.2003.00127.x

Hwang, K-K. (2011). The mandala model of self. Psychological Studies, 56(4), 329–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-011-0110-1

Hwang, K-K. (2019). Culture-inclusive theories. Cambridge University Press.

Hwang, K-K., & Yang, K-S. (1972). Chinese individual modernity and social orientation. Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica, 32, 245–278. (In Chinese).

Kâğitçibaşi, Ç. (1987). Individual and group loyalties: Are they compatible? In Ç. Kâğitçibaşi (Ed.), Growth and process in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 94–103). Swets and Zeitlinger.

LaFramboise, T., Coleman, H. L. K., & Gerton, J. (1993). Psychological impact of biculturalism: Evidence and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 114(3), 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.395

Li, P. P. (2018). The epistemology of yin-yang balancing as the root of Chinese cultural traditions. In J. Spencer-Rodgers & K. Peng (Eds.), The psychological and cultural foundations of east Asian cognition: Contradiction, change, and holism (pp. 35–79). Oxford University Press.

Liu, J. H. (2020). A commentary on commentaries on the prospects for a more equitable global psychology. In L. Sundararajan, K-K. Hwang, & K-H. Yeh (Eds.), Global psychology from indigenous perspectives: Visions inspired by K. S. Yang (pp. 177–188). Palgrave Macmillan.

Liu, J. H. (2021). Introduction to Confucian psychology: Background, content, and an agenda for the future. Psychology and Developing Societies, 33(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971333621990447

Long, W. (2019a). Indigenous psychology: Going nowhere slowly? Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 39(2), 115–119. https://doi.org/10.1037/teo0000114

Long, W. (2019b). Indigenous psychology and its moving targets. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 39(2), 130. https://doi/org/10.1037/teo0000119

Lu, L., & Yang, K-S. (2006). Emergence and composition of the traditional-modern bicultural self of people in contemporary Taiwanese societies. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 9(3), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2006.00195.x

Luna, D., Ringberg, T., & Peracchio, L. A. (2008). One individual, two identities: Frame switching among biculturals. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(2), 279–293. https://doi.org/10.1086/586914

Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346

Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. Harper & Row.

Mishra, R. C. (1996). Ecology, acculturation and psychological adaptation: A study of Adivasis in Bihar. Sage Publications.

Mishra, R. C., & Berry, J. W. (2018). Ecology, culture, and human development: Lessons for Adivasi education. Sage Publications.

Moran, P. E. (Trans.). (1993). Doctrine of the mean (zhong yong). In Three smaller wisdom books (pp. 199–247). University Press of America.

Morris, M. W., Chiu, C-Y., & Liu, Z. (2015). Polycultural psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 631–659. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015001

Pankalla, A., & Kośnik, K. (2018). Religion as an invaluable source of psychological knowledge: Indigenous Slavic psychology of religion. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 38(3), 154–164. https://doi.org/10.1037/teo0000080

Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. E. (1999). Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. American Psychologist, 54(9), 741–754. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.9.741

Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. E. (2000). Dialectical responses to questions about dialectical thinking. American Psychologist, 55(9), 1067–1068. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.9.1067

Peng, K., Spencer-Rodgers, J., & Nian, Z. (2006). Naïve dialecticism and the Tao of Chinese thought. In U. Kim, K-S. Yang, & K-K. Hwang (Eds.), Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context (pp. 247–262). Springer.

Piaget, J. (1977). The development of thought: Equilibration of cognitive structures. Viking Press.

Ratner, C. (2008). Cultural psychology, cross-cultural psychology, indigenous psychology. Nova Science Publishers.

Sinha, D. (2015). Integration of modern psychology with Indian thought. In Psychology for India (pp. 20–31). Sage Publications. (Original work published 1965)

Sisemore, T. A., & Knabb, J. J. (2020). Seeing religions and spiritualities from the inside: Problems for Western psychology that can be addressed with an indigenous psychological perspective. In The psychology of world religions and spiritualities: An indigenous perspective (pp. 3–28). Templeton Press.

Shryock, J. K. (1937). The study of human abilities: The Jen wu chih of Liu Shao. American Oriental Society.

Spencer-Rodgers, J., & Peng, K. (Eds.). (2018). The psychological and cultural foundations of East Asian cognition: Contradiction, change, and holism. Oxford University Press.

Sue, D. W., Sue, D., Neville, H. A., & Smith, L. (2019). Counseling the culturally diverse: Theory and practice (8th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Sundararajan, L. (2019a). Introduction to the special issue on “Indigenous psychology: What’s the next step?” Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 39(2), 65–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/teo0000124

Sundararajan, L. (2019b). Whither indigenous psychology? Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 39(2), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1037/teo0000115

Sundararajan, L. (2020). Taking stock and moving forward from IP to GP: Building on the legacy of K. S. Yang. In L. Sundararajan, K-K. Hwang, & K-H. Yeh (Eds.), Global psychology from indigenous perspectives: Visions inspired by K. S. Yang (pp. 247–264). Palgrave Macmillan.

Tadmor, C. T., Tetlock, P. E., & Peng, K. (2009). Acculturation strategies and integrative complexity: The cognitive implications of biculturalism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40(1), 105–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022108326279

Tran, C., Lafreniere, K., & Kuo, B. C. H. (2024). “It’s the best of both worlds!”: Investigating bicultural stress in adult bicultural Canadians. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 11(1), 58–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/1870

Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1990). On the universality of human nature and the uniqueness of the individual: The role of genetics and adaptation. Journal of Personality, 58(1), 17–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1990.tb00907.x

Verhave, T., & van Hoorn, W. (1984). The temporalization of the self. In K. J. Gergen & M. M. Gergen (Eds.), Historical social psychology (pp. 325–345). Erlbaum.

Verkuyten, M., & Pouliasi, K. (2002). Biculturalism among older children: Cultural frame switching, attributions, self-identification, and attitudes. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(6), 596–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022102238271

Wang, F-Y., Wang, Z-D., Wang, R-J. (2019). The taiji model of self. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01443

Wang, Z-D., & Wang F-Y. (2021). Ternary taiji models of the traditional Chinese self: Centered on Confucian, Taoist, and Buddhist cultures. Journal of Humanistic Psychology (Online First), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/00221678211016957

Wendt, A. N. (2024). The phenomenological perspective. In U. Wolfradt, L. Allolio-Näcke, P. S. Ruppel (Eds.), Cultural psychology: An introduction (pp. 47–56). Springer.

Yang, K-S. (1981a). Social orientation and individual modernity among Chinese students in Taiwan. The Journal of Social Psychology, 113(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1981.9924368

Yang, K-S. (1981b). The formation and change of Chinese personality: A cultural-ecological perspective. Acta Psychologica Taiwanica, 23, 39–56. (In Chinese).

Yang, K-S. (1986). Chinese personality and its change. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The psychology of the Chinese people (pp. 106–170). The Chinese University of Hong Kong.

Yang, K-S. (1988). Will societal modernization eventually eliminate cross-cultural psychological differences? In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The cross-cultural challenge to social psychology (pp. 67–85). Sage Publications.

Yang, K-S. (1996). The psychological transformation of the Chinese people as a result of societal modernization. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 479–498). Oxford University Press.

Yang, K-S. (1997a). Indigenising westernised Chinese psychology. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), Working at the interface of cultures: Eighteen lives in social science (pp. 62–76). Routledge.

Yang, K-S. (1997b). Theories and research in Chinese personality: An indigenous approach. In H. S. R. Kao & D. Sinha (Eds.), Asian perspectives on psychology (pp. 236–262). Sage Publications.

Yang, K-S. (1998). Chinese responses to modernization. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1(1), 75–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839X.00006

Yang, K-S. (2000). Monocultural and cross-cultural indigenous approaches: The royal road to the development of a balanced global psychology. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3(3), 241–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839X.00067

Yang, K-S. (2003a). Beyond Maslow’s culture-bound linear theory: A preliminary statement of the double-Y model of basic human needs. In V. Murphy-Berman & J. J. Berman (Eds.), Cross-cultural differences in perspectives on the self: Volume 49 of the Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 175–255). University of Nebraska Press.

Yang, K-S. (2003b). Methodological and theoretical issues on psychological traditionality and modernity research in an Asian society: In response to Kwang-Kuo Hwang and beyond. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 6(3), 263–285. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-839X.2003.00126.x

Yang, K-S. (2006a). Indigenized conceptual and empirical analyses of selected Chinese psychological characteristics. International Journal of Psychology, 41(4), 298–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590544000086

Yang, K-S. (2006b). Indigenous personality research: The Chinese case. In U. Kim, K-S. Yang, & K-K. Hwang (Eds.), Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context (pp. 285–314). Springer Media.

Yang, K-S. (2012). Indigenous psychology, westernized psychology, and indigenized psychology: A non-western psychologist’s view. Chang Gung Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(1), 1–32. http://cgjhsc.cgu.edu.tw/data_files/5-1%2001.pdf

Yang, K-S., & Bond, M. H. (1990). Exploring implicit personality theories with indigenous or imported constructs: The Chinese case. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1087–1095. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1087

Yang, K-S., & Ho, D. Y. F. (1988). The role of yuan in Chinese social life: A conceptual and empirical analysis. In A. C. Paranjpe, D. Y. F. Ho, & R. W. Rieber (Eds.), Asian contributions to psychology (pp. 263–281). Praeger.

Yang, K-S., Tzuo, H-Y., & Wu, C-Y. (1963). Rorschach responses of normal Chinese adults: II. The popular responses. The Journal of Social Psychology, 60(2), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1963.9922188

Yeh, K-H. (2020). Pioneer of Chinese indigenous psychology: Prof. Kuo-Shu Yang. In L. Sundararajan, K-K. Hwang, & K-H. Yeh (Eds.), Global psychology from indigenous perspectives: Visions inspired by K. S. Yang (pp. 33–44). Palgrave Macmillan.

Yu, A-B., & Yang, K-S. (1994). The nature of achievement motivation in collectivist societies. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, Ç. Kâğitçibaşi, S-C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 239–250). Sage Publications.

Yu, Y. (1992). The y-shaped structure: The nature and nurture of human nature. Huachang. (In Chinese).

Zhao, F., Woodyatt, L., Wenzel, M., & Zhao, K. (2024). “修己安人 cultivating oneself to benefit others”: A qualitative study on self-forgiveness in China. Qualitative Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000317